![]() |
| ||||||||||||||||||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #61 |
| Former Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: SE USA
Posts: 753
|
Not questioning the accuracy, but maybe a different set of facts or a different slant would have got it through. Trees can help sell real estate, after all. Tree Protection Zones can be way overstated--care to post it? Last edited by treeseer; 25th January 2009 at 01:23 PM. |
| | |
| | #62 |
| Semi-mature vigorous tree Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: PC
Posts: 176
| I think all I have is a hard copy. It was written over 7 yrs ago (pre 9/11). The article consisted of recommendations in "bullet style", TPZs just being one of many. Perhaps I should have kept it less formal?
__________________ parkcityarborist |
| | |
| | #63 |
| Former Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: SE USA
Posts: 753
| Yeah maybe a bit more chatty/feelgoody might fit their style better. bullet lists might be better in a sidebar.
|
| | |
| | #64 |
| Semi-mature vigorous tree Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: PC
Posts: 176
| What's that old saying "if you can't face them with facts baffle them with BS"?
__________________ parkcityarborist |
| | |
| | #65 |
| Semi-mature vigorous tree Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Kansas
Posts: 213
| |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |