![]() |
| ||||||||||||||||||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Mature tree Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Victoria Australia
Posts: 242
|
Here is a doozy I think Been involved in a development here in metropolitan Melbourne where a property has been subdivided It was heavily treed and under a planning overlay protecting trees as it should be The development in the end was passed and all plans stamped by the local council and approved obviously on a certain date As part of the development application an arborist report was done on the many trees - all good and correct Problem is when the development was passed and stamped by council the original arborist report was well over five years old Question is in metroplitan leafy melbourne suburb what is the maximum length of time an arborist report for such a development in a tree protected planning overlay area be valid for? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Bayside Tree Care Brisbane Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Brisbane Aus
Posts: 1,641
|
Wow five years in that climate is a long time indeed, especially when you see gums 100ft tall at 30 years, if there are no provisos within the document i would have said 2 years personally, but yes that is a doozy question!
__________________ My business:- Brisbane Bayside Tree Care |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Mature tree Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: International, Germany
Posts: 473
|
Really good question! Galbee ill agree with you, 2 years. Interested on what full time consultants have to say here. Cheers |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Veteran Heritage Status Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Victoria, Australia
Posts: 1,152
|
With the weather we have had lately the info on the report could have changed dramatically. I'm now seeing Redgums which had about 20-30% canopy cover now hovering above 90%. Some trees aren't coping too well. I'm still a 2nd year apprentice but I would have to say 5 years is a bit long.
|
| | |
| | #5 |
| Semi-mature vigorous tree Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Accord, NY USA
Posts: 50
|
Every report I do, the last paragraph includes the line ''tree should be evaluated on an annual basis.'' It is a dynamic process. Paul |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Mature tree Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Victoria Australia
Posts: 242
|
Totally agree Paul |
| | |
| | #7 | ||
| Moderator - Previously known as JayD Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: TreeWorld, Sydney Australia
Posts: 2,059
| Quote:
Quote:
__________________ Member: Australian Tree Association Join the Australian Tree Association...Have your voice heard ! Arboriculture, A life long study for some, a passing phase for others © Jeffrey J Darby 2011 | ||
| | |
| | #8 |
| Veteran Heritage Status Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,557
|
I agree. 1 to 2 years should be the limit - trees change too much for a report to be valid past that, unless of course the trees are being removed and new stock planted. Then the time limit is probably irrelevant. And then of course there are also the wishes/desires of the client for whom the report was written. Some people like a report to have no time limit -- so there should probably be an unwritten rule for arborist reports to set a length of time for validity. Paul said it best-- " the last paragraph includes the line ''tree should be evaluated on an annual basis.'' It is a dynamic process. " Perhaps 'should' -- should be changed to 'must' ........
__________________ My business: Tree Pruning and Removals -- Strump Removals -- Advice -- Consulting -- Arborist Reports Consulting Forester If you want an honest opinion, call Brent Ferris...because, Trees want to Live Too ! We do great jobs, even in small yards. Free Estimates Oakville to Oshawa - North to Bradford (Will travel further if cost of travelling covered) Email -- treeshaveneeds@3web.com Cell 416-460-5704 Last edited by Brent Ferris; 12th December 2010 at 01:12 AM. Reason: add'l thoughts |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Veteran Heritage Status Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Victoria, Australia
Posts: 1,152
|
Question for OP. Are the trees staying or going, either now or in the not so distance future?
|
| | |
| | #10 |
| Admin - Owner Palm & Tree Services in Brisbane Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Brisbane
Posts: 12,994
|
I have written 2 reports recently where the subdivisions original report was written pre Nov 2008 (The Gap storms). The retained trees finally ended up on residential house blocks but they were all storm damaged, crowns blown out and full of epicormics etc. Of course they were removed but the retention of them after Nov 2008 should have been automatically reinspected not just passed onto the land buyer. I'd say tree report 1 to 2 years but the environmental conditions really determine the scene.
__________________ |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Mature Tree Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Posts: 1,594
|
I my reports i state that it is an accurate "snap shot" of what was observed at the time of inspection and (in safety related reports) should be reinspected annually. For development, it is really up to the council, but 5 years seems a bit too long. I would ask for a revised report. I have schools that i have done annual revisions of the initial report for that sort of period and it is quite amazing the changes in trees over that period. |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| tree id pls - long long needles not pine | treebie | Tree Identification | ID | Questions and Pictures | 8 | 13th March 2010 09:21 AM |