Tree World  


Go Back   Tree World > All About Trees > General Tree Chat

Christmas trees: Real vs. artificial vs. eco-friendly

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28th November 2008, 11:58 AM   #1
Mature tree
 
Knotahippie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Bay Area Ca.
Posts: 367
Default Christmas trees: Real vs. artificial vs. eco-friendly


Quote:
Originally posted: November 27, 2008

Christmas trees: Real vs. artificial vs. eco-friendly
Which tree should you buy?

It may be the season of kindness and generosity, but there's a civil war raging within the Christmas tree industry.

Artificial tree lovers have been known to perpetuate the myth that once-living Christmas trees contribute to deforestation.

Tree farmers love to point out that the first artificial Christmas trees resembled large green toilet bowl brushes. And a third side -- which splintered off from the tree farmers -- says the best tree to buy is one that has been raised in an environmentally conscious manner.

We wouldn't dream of telling you what kind of tree to buy; that decision is as personal as whether to have a tree at all. But we can give you a few pros and cons to consider before making a purchase.

ARTIFICIAL TREES

PROS: An alternative for those with allergies or asthma. Some people are allergic to terpene, the substance found in the oil or sap of Christmas trees, according to the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology.

Durable. They last about six years.

Affordable. They're generally cheaper than cut trees because you can use them more than once. Trees with polyethylene (PE) needles are more expensive than polyvinyl chloride (PVC). Some come with warranties. Home Depot (homedepot.com) sells trees ranging from $39.99 to $2,499. Target sells a 3-foot Willowstreet Fir artificial tree for $9.99.

Easier to assemble and maintain. Instant Plaid Pull-up Trees ($179) come with decorations in place. Simply pull the tree up over a metal stand and plug it in. Plastic trees don't shed their needles and don't need to be cared for.

No risk of a Charlie Brown tree. Artificial trees come in an astonishing array of sizes and appearances. Pre-lit trees save time in assembly, take-down and have been credited for reducing domestic squabbles.

CONS:

Gigantic carbon footprint. Artificial trees are usually made from petroleum and shipped from China; the pole and branches are primarily made of steel while the needles are made with polyvinyl chloride (PVC), also known as vinyl, or polyethylene (PE).The American Christmas Tree Association sponsored a study that shows artificial trees are healthier for the environment over a 10-year period due to the costs of transporting a real tree from a lot to someone's home. Still, some beg to differ. "That's absurd," said Rick Dungey of the National Christmas Tree Association. "How big is the carbon footprint of the cargo ship that carried the fake tree across the Pacific ocean? OR the 18 wheeler that carried it froma port on the Pacific Coast to a store in Chicago.?"

PVC is not biodegradable. If incinerated, the PVC in the trees emits dioxins and other carcinogens. The manufacture of PVC also creates dioxins. Major retailers including Target and Toys "R" Us are phasing out products with PVC.

Lead is often used as a PVC stabilizer. Lead, a toxic metal that can cause damage to the brain and nervous system, is more dangerous for children. University of North Carolina researchers tested the lead content in branches, on hands after contact and in dust under the tree. They found that "while the average artificial Christmas tree does not present a significant exposure risk, in the worst-case scenario a substantial health risk to young children is quite possible."

No natural scent. Some people solve this by using aerosol sprays or pine-scented air fresheners, but the fumes from most products contain dozens of chemicals, including several classified as toxic or hazardous, according to a University of Washington study.

FARMED TREES

PROS:

More environmentally friendly than artificial trees. An estimated 40 million to 45 million trees were planted in 2008 in North America, according to the National Christmas Tree Association (realchristmastrees.org). The tree farms provide habitat for wildlife, remove dust and pollen from the air and absorb carbon dioxide. Plus they smell good.

Renewable and recyclable. Most tree farms plant one to three trees for every one that is cut. The branches and trees can be ground into mulch. Recycled trees have been used to make sand and soil erosion barriers and been placed in ponds for fish shelters, according to the University of Illinois Extension. To find a tree recycler, go to realchristmastrees.org or earth911.com.

Can be locally produced. The Illinois Christmas Tree Association (309-274-9627, lists the state's Christmas tree farms.

Hardy. Tree farms are often placed in areas that would otherwise be unusable, such as barren slopes or areas under power lines.

CONS

Pesticide use. Christmas trees require several applications of chemicals to control pests and speed growth. While the chemical residue on cut trees is minimal, the pesticides used in Christmas tree production have been detected in groundwater or well water. Both pyrethroids and the more toxic class of organophosphates are used on Christmas trees. Pyrethroids are responsible for a growing number of human poisoning incidents involving pesticides in the U.S., according to an investigation by the Center for Public Integrity.

Higher maintenance. You have to haul the tree home, put the darn thing up and water it. And the needles can fall off.

You can't always get what you want. Most consumers want a thick, full tree, but you're at the mercy of the suppliers. Sparse Charlie Brown trees with short needles are becoming more popular, according to the NCTA, but less sheared trees are often harder to find.

Cost: At Lowe's, real trees range from $39 to $299.

'ENVIRONMENTALLY RESPONSIBLE' TREES

These cut trees have similar pros and cons to regular real trees with the following differences:

PROS:

Trees are certified. An independent party evaluates growers on several criteria, including erosion control/soil conservation, integrated pest management (IPM) and tributary protection, said Joe Sharp, president and founder of the Coalition of Environmentally Conscious Growers.

Trees grown with minimal chemicals. Ladybugs, for example, which keep aphids and mites under control, are one of a Christmas tree's best friends. IPM principles also stress worker health, biodiversity and education.

CONS:

Shipping costs. Environmentally responsible trees found at Menards come from Oregon -- closer than China but farther than Illinois.

Slightly more expensive. Price depends on the species but "ours might be a few dollars more," said Sharp.

Even eco-friendlier

* Decorate a houseplant.

* Buy a potted tree that can be planted in your yard after the holidays

* String up lights on a tree in your front yard.

* Build your own wooden tree.
Christmas trees: Real vs. artificial vs. eco-friendly | Julie's Health Club - Where alternative and mainstream health meet
Knotahippie is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Propeller this post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2008, 03:05 PM   #2
Sappling
 
Manx_Tree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Manx climber in Canada
Posts: 26
Default Re: Christmas trees: Real vs. artificial vs. eco-friendly

Well, I have been having a similar in-depth discussions with my girlfriend (and anyone who makes eye contact and close enough to listen) but this information is way more concise.

Thanks Knotahippie. Im a believer that, even though some see the cutting of 'Fresh' trees as the unnecessary death of a living thing, the farming of Christmas trees creates large areas of green habitat that, as you said, would otherwise be unused/ unusable (or parking-lots waiting to happen!).

One thing that your thread has made me think about is the eco-friendly approach to Christmas tree farming. Im begining to think that once consumers understand the enviromental benefits (or at least the reduced impact on the environment) of real trees, a trend will follow for the 'Organic Christmas Tree' as a trend for 'Organic Fruit and Vegetables' already exists.

Thanks again.
__________________
Can't see the wood for the trees........

HNC Arboriculture, Diploma Forestry, NPTC,
ISA PR4757-A
Manx_Tree is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Propeller this post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2008, 10:55 AM   #3
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
pcarborist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: PC
Posts: 173
Default Re: Christmas trees: Real vs. artificial vs. eco-friendly

Quote:
ARTIFICIAL TREES

PROS: An alternative for those with allergies or asthma. Some people are allergic to terpene, the substance found in the oil or sap of Christmas trees, according to the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology.

Durable. They last about six years.

Affordable. They're generally cheaper than cut trees because you can use them more than once. Trees with polyethylene (PE) needles are more expensive than polyvinyl chloride (PVC). Some come with warranties. Home Depot (homedepot.com) sells trees ranging from $39.99 to $2,499. Target sells a 3-foot Willowstreet Fir artificial tree for $9.99.

Easier to assemble and maintain. Instant Plaid Pull-up Trees ($179) come with decorations in place. Simply pull the tree up over a metal stand and plug it in. Plastic trees don't shed their needles and don't need to be cared for.

No risk of a Charlie Brown tree. Artificial trees come in an astonishing array of sizes and appearances. Pre-lit trees save time in assembly, take-down and have been credited for reducing domestic squabbles.
Now if we can just convince the us govt to erect a "national artificial christmas tree"?

or better yet
Quote:
String up lights on a tree in your front yard.
.
George, you out there?
__________________
parkcityarborist
pcarborist is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Propeller this post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2008, 05:06 AM   #4
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NW California
Posts: 86
Default Re: Christmas trees: Real vs. artificial vs. eco-friendly

No tree, won't kill one for Christ. Nix on the fake.
__________________
RandyMac
RandyMac is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Propeller this post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pohutukawa| Metrosideros excelsa, thomasii, kermadecensi| Lifespan| NZ Christmas Bush Ekka General Tree Chat 17 21st February 2010 07:51 PM
OH&S, real cases, real people ... smarten up! Get professional or get fined. Ekka General Tree Chat 13 3rd October 2008 12:12 AM
An Old Christmas / Wintertime Poem mdvaden Non Tree Related chat 20 10th December 2007 08:42 AM


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 03:33 PM.


TreeWorld @ 2010