Tree World  


Go Back   Tree World > All About Trees > General Tree Chat

Alloy vs steel carabiners karabiners for tree work

View Poll Results: Which carabiner do you prefer to climb on
Steel 18 33.33%
Alloy 36 66.67%
Voters: 54. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16th November 2007, 06:23 PM   #31
Admin - Owner Palm & Tree Services in Brisbane
 
Eric Frei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 12,994
Default Re: Alloy vs steel carabiners karabiners for tree work

I think a few guys might have surface rust issues from the weather they work in.

Mine are OK but shiny would be nice too.
Eric Frei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2007, 01:40 PM   #32
Moderator
 
JohN Dee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Climbing around the world
Posts: 848
Default Re: Alloy vs steel carabiners karabiners for tree work

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ekka View Post
$59 here Omega Steel Karabiner - KA264

But here they're $30
National Height Safety & Solutions

Are they the same biner though as models seems different but they look the same?
We paid $48 for our one at SRTAustralia/Onrope at Padstow.

I use the steel triple locks for climbing. I know i've rigged with karabiners before, but isn't it true that karabiners arnt rated for shockloading?
__________________
We are what we repeatedly do... Excellence then, is not an act, but HABIT...

Red : Green : Blue
JohN Dee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2007, 02:57 PM   #33
Over mature heritage tree
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 952
Default

Ratings are measures in force. 10 Kn (2,250 lb) hanging static on a line is the same force as a dropped load of X which accelerates and whose deceleration results in a 10 Kn force. How the force is applied may be different, but if the resultant force is the same, 10 Kn is 10 Kn. Ratings are designated to tell you a caribiner or scaffold hook or Maillon Rapide will stand forces up to that rating. So technically, yes, they are force rated and thus rated for static or impact force.

I use Kong Stainless slideline biners for light rigging. I don't know why I want other stainless biners.... the responsible explanation is that I'm addicted to climbing hardware. No real good reason, other than that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Franz nel
Are you guys all smarter than me or what? In spite of taking great care I continually find myself loading biners in the lateral direction.
We're no smarter. Just different ways to deal with that situation. Keeping the caribiner oriented in one direction, so it can't rotate, very, very important.

Quite easy to deal with, using spliced eyes or eyed terminations. If you tie bulky knots and drop a biner onto that, you're limited. For permanent ends, if you do your own, create a small eye, that's one way. Or you can Awl a single stitch through the eye to constrict and tighten the eye around the biner. Or take a broccoli band (fat, short rubber band), give it a loop-over over the terminated eye, stretch, twist, loop-over again. This will squeeze the eye. Insert biner. Surgical tubing, like that used on the big shot, cut a 1-2 cm long piece. Spread and open it up. Insert the eye through it, release the tubing around the eye.

There ya go Franz Nel. There are also stainless steel 'traps', plastic traps, and leather traps from most Arborist supply, all designed to hold a caribiner in the proper orientation and keep it from flipping. Lateral loading bad, as we all know. Try one of the ideas above, I think you'll have great results.
Tree Machine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2007, 03:06 PM   #34
Veteran Heritage Status
 
Drouin Tree Service's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,727
Default Re: Alloy vs steel carabiners karabiners for tree work

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ekka View Post
$59 here Omega Steel Karabiner - KA264

But here they're $30
National Height Safety & Solutions

Are they the same biner though as models seems different but they look the same?
Thanks for the link ekka ill be buying a few of those..
Drouin Tree Service is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2007, 03:10 PM   #35
Part of the Furniture
 
newguy18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: orlando,fl
Posts: 4,948
Talking Re: Alloy vs steel carabiners karabiners for tree work

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tree Machine View Post
Ratings are measures in force. 10 Kn (2,250 lb) hanging static on a line is the same force as a dropped load of X which accelerates and whose deceleration results in a 10 Kn force. How the force is applied may be different, but if the resultant force is the same, 10 Kn is 10 Kn. Ratings are designated to tell you a caribiner or scaffold hook or Maillon Rapide will stand forces up to that rating. So technically, yes, they are force rated and thus rated for static or impact force.

I use Kong Stainless slideline biners for light rigging. I don't know why I want other stainless biners.... the responsible explanation is that I'm addicted to climbing hardware. No real good reason, other than that.

We're no smarter. Just different ways to deal with that situation. Keeping the caribiner oriented in one direction, so it can't rotate, very, very important.

Quite easy to deal with, using spliced eyes or eyed terminations. If you tie bulky knots and drop a biner onto that, you're limited. For permanent ends, if you do your own, create a small eye, that's one way. Or you can Awl a single stitch through the eye to constrict and tighten the eye around the biner. Or take a broccoli band (fat, short rubber band), give it a loop-over over the terminated eye, stretch, twist, loop-over again. This will squeeze the eye. Insert biner. Surgical tubing, like that used on the big shot, cut a 1-2 cm long piece. Spread and open it up. Insert the eye through it, release the tubing around the eye.

There ya go Franz Nel. There are also stainless steel 'traps', plastic traps, and leather traps from most Arborist supply, all designed to hold a caribiner in the proper orientation and keep it from flipping. Lateral loading bad, as we all know. Try one of the ideas above, I think you'll have great results.
I thought he was talking about the biner for his split tail.What i do is use both my climb line and split tail on the same biner but i've known some to connect the two biners with a quick link.Personally i found when the split tail biner side loads it is when you pull on your main line so when you advance your hitch the biner returns to normal so I don't know if I'd worry about it too much.
__________________
Have your say join us today.


old schooler

Last edited by newguy18; 18th May 2009 at 01:20 AM.
newguy18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th November 2007, 07:22 PM   #36
Former Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Bakersfield, Ca
Posts: 2,497
Default Re: Alloy vs steel carabiners karabiners for tree work

I've never had lateral loading problems.... though alot of the rigging biners I use are D's... as in the shape. It helps to align the direction of pull along the spine's axis.

Since I don't have that problem, I'm not entirely savvy as to what you blokes mean, if I'm complicating the issue...

Some biners are made with lateral stanchions and such which don't allow associated biners or lines to move away from vertical axis loading.
Therrin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th November 2007, 07:50 PM   #37
Admin - Owner Palm & Tree Services in Brisbane
 
Eric Frei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 12,994
Default Re: Alloy vs steel carabiners karabiners for tree work

Quote:
Originally Posted by newguy18 View Post
Whati do is use both my climb line and split tail on the same biner but i've known some to connect the two biners with a quick link.
That's what I do, 1 biner, simple. The lifeline is double fishtail tied then the split tail just slots in, however new ANSI standards say they should be tight on the biner and then the split tail should be either tight spliced or girth hitched ... here in lies the problem with one biner for girth hitching the 13mm dia split tail.

It aint gonna happen, not enough room. So spliced split tail are the go.

But for me spliced split tails not so good as the taper in the splice tends to stop me getting close up cinched. In palms I may have to cinch up around fronds directly in front of me, the taper of the splice means it wont bite, the prussik just slides.

Arghhh, I'll live with the cross loading fear and check on it ... hence why I feel screw gates are safer.
Eric Frei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd December 2008, 04:34 PM   #38
Former Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Bakersfield, Ca
Posts: 2,497
Default Re: Alloy vs steel carabiners karabiners for tree work

Screwgates are safer? Ekka, surely you dont mean that!

Can I ditch my sticky-gate auto's now?

Oh, no, I cant, OSHA regs and insurance...pffft...
Therrin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd December 2008, 08:39 PM   #39
Admin - Owner Palm & Tree Services in Brisbane
 
Eric Frei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 12,994
Default Re: Alloy vs steel carabiners karabiners for tree work

Today I was cleaning palms, doing change overs to get around the fronds and crap.

I looked and checked my biner and guess what, the gate had hairy shit in it, it looked closed but wasn't.

I dont like triple lock, never have and I know when a screw gate is done up and when it aint.

The problem is people get lazy and dont screw them up, but people run red lights too and that doesn't mean we change the colour of them all either.

I prefer and trust screw gates, the rest are like some bad assed haunting in the back of my mind whilst I'm working. The industry progresses at the pace of the dumbest untrained bastid in it at times I feel, hence the rules for all sorts of BS that frankly shouldn't be there.

Quote:
9 CONCLUSIONS
1 Using current standard climbing methods, existing 3-way karabiner design cannot be
relied upon completely to retain the climbing and prussik rope securely when used in
arboricultural industry.
2 The climbing and prussik rope can become detached from the karabiner for two reasons.
1. The gate can be opened due to contact with climber, equipment or tree; or
2. The gate can fail to initially close. It is possible that some reported incidents were
caused by a combination of both.
3 Some types of 3-way karabiner do not close reliably even when new.
4 Contamination of the 3-way karabiner mechanism can result in failure to close reliably.
5 Karabiners should be inspected by users more frequently and thoroughly than would
appear common practice at present. The inspection should pay particular attention to
the reliability of closure.
6 Karabiners should be replaced more frequently than would appear commonplace at
present. They do not have an infinite life but many arborists do not know how to
identify when a 3-way karabiner needs to be replaced. Maintenance in order to free
sticking karabiners is often short term and, depending on contamination, cleaning can
be impracticable. Replacement is therefore sometimes more appropriate.
7 Techniques have been recommended for attaching climbing and prussik rope to the
karabiner, which can improve the security of these ropes in the karabiner. Use of these
techniques will reduce the risk of existing designs of karabiner becoming detached.
8 The use of back-to-back karabiners to increase the security is impracticable.
9 Returning to the use of screw-gate karabiners will not solve the current problems but
only reinstate earlier ones. The use of steel rather than alloy may also present as many
problems as it would solve.
10 Many used 3-way karabiners do not close reliably. This in some cases is attributable to
the karabiner design.
11 To improve karabiner safety, the security of the closure and locking mechanism must be
improved. This will require design changes in order that they perform better in the
arboriculture industry.
12 Karabiners need to be supplied with a practicable maintenance method appropriate to
the industry in which they are being used.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf hsl03-18.pdf (527.9 KB, 65 views)
Eric Frei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd December 2008, 11:35 PM   #40
Veteran Heritage Status
 
Drouin Tree Service's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,727
Default Re: Alloy vs steel carabiners karabiners for tree work

Screw gates are the only biner ill buy,i dont care what anyone else chooses to lose there life over..
Drouin Tree Service is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24th December 2008, 12:22 PM   #41
Former Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Perth
Posts: 307
Default Re: Alloy vs steel carabiners karabiners for tree work

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ekka View Post
Today I was cleaning palms, doing change overs to get around the fronds and crap.

I looked and checked my biner and guess what, the gate had hairy shit in it, it looked closed but wasn't.

I dont like triple lock, never have and I know when a screw gate is done up and when it aint.

The problem is people get lazy and dont screw them up, but people run red lights too and that doesn't mean we change the colour of them all either.

I prefer and trust screw gates, the rest are like some bad assed haunting in the back of my mind whilst I'm working. The industry progresses at the pace of the dumbest untrained bastid in it at times I feel, hence the rules for all sorts of BS that frankly shouldn't be there.
Where was the inserted quote with multiple points drawn from Eric?

As to krabs in general, ALL climbing tools are only as good as the last time they were checked. My climbing teacher had a good friend with (at the time) over a decade of hard core arbor climbing experience. One day he failed to check his maillon(?) was screwed closed and fell 8 metres. He has never walked again. Screwgates are not safe. Maillons are not safe. 3 ways are not safe. Prussics are not safe. Unless you check them before and during every climb.
OutofMytree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th May 2009, 11:34 PM   #42
Sappling
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Mt Macedon, Vic
Posts: 42
Default Re: Alloy vs steel carabiners karabiners for tree work

Time to pull back to the original thread. All points are valid, but drifting away from the original poll.

I was taught to use either steel or alloy for rope/rope or rope/harness, but if connecting to something like a shackle, should always use steel...perhaps because the casting of the shackle may not be nice and smooth like a 'biner.
Tom Forrest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th May 2009, 11:47 PM   #43
I'm new here so be nice
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: East Coast
Posts: 4
Default Re: Alloy vs steel carabiners karabiners for tree work

I also use aluminum for climbing and steel for rigging. OK Triacts with the HitchClimber and ISC or DMM with the Anchor Bridge.
pgwisn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2009, 04:50 PM   #44
Sappling
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Devonport Tasmania
Posts: 10
Default Re: Alloy vs steel carabiners karabiners for tree work

Quote:
Originally Posted by rangitata View Post
I always use alloy for my personal climbing system, But steel for any type of rigging. That way thay can never be mistaken.

Mike
Me too
Rob Murf is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
what other skills besides tree work do you have? newguy18 Non Tree Related chat 2 15th July 2007 04:22 PM
Looking for work Crawford Kidd ANNOUNCEMENTS 4 6th June 2007 02:42 PM
Work in Australia Gerhard ANNOUNCEMENTS 3 3rd May 2007 03:56 PM
Fam at work Fairfield Picture Forum 6 5th April 2007 09:44 AM
Tree Work & Body Building JohN Dee General Tree Chat 3 2nd March 2007 11:56 PM


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 04:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Advertising on Treeworld
TreeWorld @ 2012