Tree World  


Go Back   Tree World > Tree Work Graphics - Videos and Pictures > Picture Forum

Removing Codominants / How to get around this hazard?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 5th May 2007, 10:04 AM   #1
Former Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 397
Default Removing Codominants / How to get around this hazard?

The other topic that showed the big codominant leader sweet gum, reminded me of this sweet gum that split apart in our neighborhood, a couple of years ago ... see attachment...

So I was curious about what you folks do to remove them, and avoid the hazard of a potential split while climbing.

If both sides are just as weak, do you pick one?

Do you secure one half to the other to reinforce it?

All it took to drop that sweet gum, was the weight of the first good rain fall at the end of summmer.
Attached Thumbnails
Removing Codominants / How to get around this hazard?-10.18.04-009.jpg  
mdvaden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2007, 10:34 AM   #2
Monument Status
 
Sean Freeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Townsville Nth Queensland & Gold Coast Sth Queensland
Posts: 1,985
Default

If the particular situation was such that there was no other option to removal of one of the codom limbs (a situation I have not yet encountered, there always being other preferred options for me...reduction pruning on on or both limbs with or without a view to succession plantings) then I would pay great attention to the forces I was going to impart to the limb I'm on and the tree as a whole, might not be any good bracing the codom against itself if both could fail under loading. If there's other trees structures near enough to brace to then I'd prefer to set up a floating TIP between two of those-tyrolean style if the concerns about structural integrity were so great, having said that Steve doesn't have the gear for that set up so would probably price us out of the job. (This is of course based on the premise that EWP can't be set up etc...)
I haven't done work off a tyrolean yet but have set a couple up as rec climbs for fun (which they are!)

Removing a codom of any size has such a big impact (tree time) on the tree as a whole I'd be talking through the whys and wherefores with the client very clearly so they know what i believe would be the most sensible approach.
Sean Freeman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2007, 10:58 AM   #3
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 132
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by boa07 View Post
reduction pruning on one or both limbs
I use a method which I call sub-dominating.

Depending on potential targets if failure should occur, and the age, size and value of the tree I will crown reduce only one of the co-cominant stems every 5 years or so. It's always the same side.

This allows for new growth from the other side to slowly fill in the space which was formally filled with the branches of the reduced stem.

This done as part of an ongoing method which finally ends when the un pruned stem's new growth has completly replaced the original sub dominated stem.

I am currently sub-dominating about 13 mature co dominant trees Oak, Ash, Beech, Maple and Yew each in individual gardens for separate clients.

Its working very well.

I have also cabled many co dom trees.

If I am rigging them down and there is a bad included bark union which cause me concern, i will put 2 rigging blocks in each stem at the same height and run the lowering rope through both pulleys, this allows for better dissipation of the forces created when rigging dynamic loads. I will rig one stem off the other and vice versa.

If the Co dominant stem has a extensive decay at the union i will use a Mewp
Tim Craig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2007, 01:56 PM   #4
Former Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 397
Default

By the way, to clarify... I'm referring to getting into position to cut and remove a codominant tree. A take-down of trees with a large and obvious weak union.

Last edited by mdvaden; 5th May 2007 at 02:46 PM.
mdvaden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2007, 07:05 PM   #5
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Streyken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 150
Default

I usually tie the stems together as high as reasonable and cinch tight. Removing the large outside limbs reduces a lot of weight quickly and I climb the inside. Of course there are many variables, but as a general answer I do the above. In situations like that I almost always climb as high as I can so I can hold the top - no large roping, no swinging around. This also assumes there is no other way (nearby tree, bucket, 20' orchard ladder and power pruner, etc.). Done a lot of topped hemlock and red alder that way, both are very susceptible to rot. Also slow and steady, bad things happen when one doesn't want to be up there and is in a hurry.
__________________

Trimmin' bush and caring for flowers is good 'n' all...
but sometimes ya gotta let the big wood fly and pound the garden.
Streyken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2007, 09:39 PM   #6
Admin - Razor sharp and independent 2 X Diploma Level 5 qualified arborist
 
Eric Frei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 12,820
Default

Check out this co-dominant ironbark, near 100' tall was next door to the house I was working in.

Pics out of my mobile phone so that's why the quality sucks a bit.

So I went next door to let them know of the hazard, was a Hindu Temple, they'll have a meeting then decide.
Attached Thumbnails
Removing Codominants / How to get around this hazard?-topoftree-1.jpg   Removing Codominants / How to get around this hazard?-baseoftree-1.jpg   Removing Codominants / How to get around this hazard?-codomcloseup.jpg   Removing Codominants / How to get around this hazard?-sideonview.jpg  
Eric Frei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2007, 11:21 PM   #7
Mature Tree
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Posts: 1,605
Default

Scroll down to my post in here:
V and U shaped Crotch Strengths, included bark| codominant stems etc

THis Spotted Gum was failing at a co-dominant. Stems were secrured to each other, then careful removal, low shockloading, light rigging.
TrevMcRev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2007, 10:26 AM   #8
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 132
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdvaden View Post
By the way, to clarify... I'm referring to getting into position to cut and remove a codominant tree. A take-down of trees with a large and obvious weak union.
Sorry Mdvaden,

I misunderstood

Ekka, am I on Tachy goes to Coventry?

If so then tell the Hindus re their co dom stem to Govinda jai ah jai ah

just kidding buddy.

am i on tachy goes to coventry???
Tim Craig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2007, 10:35 AM   #9
Admin - Razor sharp and independent 2 X Diploma Level 5 qualified arborist
 
Eric Frei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 12,820
Default

No you are not, what you write is seen by all
Eric Frei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2007, 11:59 AM   #10
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 132
Default

Thanks Ekka, that's good to know.

On the subject of Hindus I feel it is very important that you are made aware of the significance of trees in some aspects and areas of Hinduism.

Co-dominance is a very interesting concept, not just for trees but for humans as well, it could be said that some humans have co-dominant personalities.

It has even been known in some very rare cases that humans can even exhibit tri-dominant and quad-dominant personalities.

Anyway back to Hinduism did you guys know that in some Hindu communities it is normal for a human being to marry a tree.

Now, you've all heard of tree-hugging right? this surely takes the concept to a whole new level. Don't believe me?

Check this out - http://www.vepachedu.org/treemarriages.html

What tree would you marry and why?

I'd marry a Pam
Tim Craig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2007, 12:49 PM   #11
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 132
Default

Seriously Ekka,

That co-dominant stem in the photos is one of the worst I have seen in a long time, a real structural weakness, and the two stems are just gonna continue to push themselves apart, eventually leading to failure and tear out of one of the stems, leading to total removal of what is left.

If there is indeed a target(Hindu Temple) under that tree I hope you can convince them to remove it.

Goodluck
Tim Craig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2007, 12:52 PM   #12
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 132
Default

The tree that is, not the Temple, although if they moved the Temple that would be a solution to the potential hazard caused by the structural weakness of the co-dominant stem.
Tim Craig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2007, 01:46 PM   #13
Admin - Razor sharp and independent 2 X Diploma Level 5 qualified arborist
 
Eric Frei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 12,820
Default

Well, the Hindu dudes are going to have a meeting.

They were at a future date going to flatten that whole area and build more so they might just accelerate their plans.

The man I spoke with was very nice and understood straight away, he had a white robe dress thing on and a yellow dot on his forehead ... I wasn't going to ask what that meant though. He lived in the house on site provided, head honcho or something.
Eric Frei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th May 2007, 06:35 AM   #14
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 132
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ekka View Post
The man I spoke with was very nice and understood straight away, he had a white robe dress thing on and a yellow dot on his forehead ... I wasn't going to ask what that meant though.
The yellow dot is called a tilaka I think, It symbolises what branch of Hinduism your from, the yellow dot could be a symbol for a rising sun.

You should have asked him Ekka, he would've been happy to tell you.

Anyway back to the codominant tree - climb, crane or bucket truck for removal?
Tim Craig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th May 2007, 04:33 PM   #15
Admin - Razor sharp and independent 2 X Diploma Level 5 qualified arborist
 
Eric Frei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 12,820
Default

Be an excavator and tub grinder job if they're building.

They'll just push that over ... sort of.
Eric Frei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2007, 01:58 PM   #16
Admin - Razor sharp and independent 2 X Diploma Level 5 qualified arborist
 
Eric Frei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 12,820
Default

Check this codominant failure out, no storm or wind ... just failed.
Attached Thumbnails
Removing Codominants / How to get around this hazard?-1.jpg   Removing Codominants / How to get around this hazard?-2.jpg   Removing Codominants / How to get around this hazard?-3.jpg   Removing Codominants / How to get around this hazard?-4.jpg   Removing Codominants / How to get around this hazard?-5.jpg   Removing Codominants / How to get around this hazard?-6.jpg  

Eric Frei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2007, 02:21 PM   #17
Moderator - Previously known as JayD
 
Jeff Darby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: TreeWorld, Sydney Australia
Posts: 2,031
Default Pitty about the car

Hi Ekka,
This co-dom, looks to me as though it's been hanging by a whisker for a while,as you can see by fresh tear in the wood,it doesn't take much when there are like this as long as you weren't up there or no one took a hit to the head it's a good one, It would have been a really good one if there was no targets underneath at all.Did the customer know about the fracture up there I noticed a bit of rope up there?? was that an attempt to hold it together?? If so silly billy's for parking the car there!
__________________

Member: Australian Tree Association

Join the Australian Tree Association...Have your voice heard !

Arboriculture, A life long study for some, a passing phase for others

© Jeffrey J Darby 2011
Jeff Darby is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2007, 05:38 PM   #18
Admin - Razor sharp and independent 2 X Diploma Level 5 qualified arborist
 
Eric Frei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 12,820
Default

Ha

That's bits and pieces of an ole tree house hanging there, sort of fitting isn't it.
Eric Frei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2007, 10:45 PM   #19
Mature Tree
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Posts: 1,605
Default

I chuckle to myself how whenever i park under/near a large tree i cant help but to do a quick inspection of it first.

A few times i have moved the car.
TrevMcRev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2007, 10:50 PM   #20
Moderator
 
JohN Dee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Climbing around the world
Posts: 855
Default

Lol Trev, I'll chuckle with you - that's hilarious! I'll have to keep it in mind when I park my car from now on.
__________________
We are what we repeatedly do... Excellence then, is not an act, but HABIT...

Red : Green : Blue
JohN Dee is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT +11. The time now is 04:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Advertising on Treeworld | Your Business Directory
TreeWorld @ 2011