Tree World  


Go Back   Tree World > All About Trees > Tree Industry injuries, accidents and fatalities

Throwback death discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25th October 2009, 08:00 PM   #1
Admin - Razor sharp and independent 2 X Diploma Level 5 qualified arborist
 
Eric Frei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 12,820
Default Throwback death discussion

I came across this detailed information where sadly a 25yo tree faller died from head injuries when a limb came back and "got him".

The thing about this case is the guy did vacate the stump area at 45 degrees and was 21 feet away from the stump when it "got him".

Now add to this that he actually felled the tree downhill away from him, and the down hill was steep at 35 degrees this starts sounding pretty unrealistic.

However OSH investigated in detail, and as expected came to some conclusions to the fatal accident.

Here's the link to the case.

NIOSH FACE Program: West Virginia Case Report 99WV005 | CDC/NIOSH

I have also converted that page to a PDF and loaded it for continuity.

I have sketched what the tree may have looked like, we have a 24" DBH Yellow poplar on a 35% hill, the tree had a 60' long limb which grew perpendicular to the trunk at 18' high from ground. The limb was only 6" diameter where it attached to the trunk but it was 60' long! Now the piece that struck and killed the faller was only 3" diameter.

Attached Thumbnails
Throwback death discussion-throwbacklimb.jpg  
Attached Files
File Type: pdf throwbackdeath1998.pdf (749.8 KB, 54 views)
Eric Frei is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 25th October 2009, 08:55 PM   #2
Bayside Tree Care Brisbane
 
Garry Brockley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Brisbane Aus
Posts: 1,649
Default Re: Throwback death discussion

Thats an incredible chain of events that led to the mans death, the chances of that happening must be billions to one. like i always say when your times up there's nothing you can do about it.
__________________
Garry Brockley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th October 2009, 09:49 PM   #3
Admin - Razor sharp and independent 2 X Diploma Level 5 qualified arborist
 
Eric Frei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 12,820
Default Re: Throwback death discussion

Here's the investigators take, I bolded bits.
Quote:

INVESTIGATION


On December 1, 1998, the company was selectively harvesting the tract and had begun work at approximately 8:00 a.m. It was reported by the National Climatic Data Center within the area to be a dry day. There was no snow on the ground the day of the incident. The owner and three employees were working that day. At approximately 3:00 p.m., the victim approached a yellow poplar located adjacent to a skid road on the uphill side. The terrain above the skid road at the incident site was sloped approximately 25 %; below the road was 40%. The poplar was approximately 24 inches in diameter at breast height and 90 feet tall. The tree had a large 65-foot -long limb which was 18 feet above the ground at the tree’s base. The limb was approximately 6 inches in diameter at the point of attachment and was oriented 90 degrees to the tree’s trunk. The limb was pointing directly downhill, which was also the intended direction of the felling. The victim implemented a standard open notched cut with a near perfect hinge. The hinge had directed the tree to the desired opening across the skid road (see Figure 1). The tree did not contact any other timber during its fall. After making the final cut, the victim retreated approximately 21 feet from the stump at an angle close to 45 degrees uphill from the cutting side along a previously established deer trail (see Figure 2). The victim was hit on the back of the head with the tapered end of the limb as it folded under or flipped back uphill towards the logger (see Figure 3). A dozer operator discovered the victim shortly after the incident and notified the owner. The owner administered first aid and CPR. Another worker ran to a local residence and contacted EMS. The owner continued administering CPR for nearly one hour until EMS arrived. The site was extremely remote. The victim was life-flighted to the local trauma center and died the next day. The victim experienced a severe injury to the back of the head. He was wearing a hard hat at the time of the incident.
From the discussion part of the article:-

Quote:
Discussion: Two potential hazards existed which contributed to this incident. The tree had a non-typical growth pattern which produced a 65-foot long limb positioned relatively close to the ground (18 feet above grade), which in turn had grown perpendicular to the trunk and was pointing downhill. Additionally, the terrain below the tree was unevenly sloped due to natural formation and the presence of the skid road. Timber with limbs whose lengths are longer than the vertical distance from the ground to limb attachment can be hazardous. In this case, folding the limb backwards towards the feller would have allowed the limb to extend approximately 47 feet behind/past the stump. As a throwback, the limb’s length well exceeded the distance from notch to limb’s attachment point. A limb which is close to the ground will contact the ground sooner during felling, shortening both throwback distance to the feller and the feller’s reaction time.
So the limb makes contact with the ground long before the tree is down. The tree is gathering momentum and the force upon the limb breaks the limb which is severely torqued. The limbs length is long enough to hit the faller.

He was hit in the back of the head, either he turned to duck or had his back to it. This is the part I'm really focusing on, turning your back on the tree.

A while ago I started this thread with the variety of options.

Tree felling escape path routine

I believe had this guy been watching he would have got out of the way, I honestly believe that. I also believe for him to get 21' away it went over slow, time was his friend, to get 21' away up an incline like that means he had time.
Eric Frei is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 26th October 2009, 10:16 PM   #4
Bayside Tree Care Brisbane
 
Garry Brockley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Brisbane Aus
Posts: 1,649
Default Re: Throwback death discussion

what if he was running up hill away from a problem he saw happening? you run fast forward and scramble backwards that would make sense 21 feet up hill at a run, tree falls, breaks, throws a limb.Possible?
__________________
Garry Brockley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th October 2009, 11:52 PM   #5
Admin - Razor sharp and independent 2 X Diploma Level 5 qualified arborist
 
Eric Frei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 12,820
Default Re: Throwback death discussion

Well, you'd tend to dodge an on coming event by going sideways wouldn't you?
Eric Frei is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27th October 2009, 07:11 PM   #6
Bayside Tree Care Brisbane
 
Garry Brockley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Brisbane Aus
Posts: 1,649
Default Re: Throwback death discussion

yes but in an incident when adrenaline is flowing fine motor skills and free thought fail, you do what you always do, in this case it could have been back at 45 deg as he always has. just a thought. plus we dont know what was to the side of him either.
__________________
Garry Brockley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st November 2009, 02:58 AM   #7
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Duncan, BC, Canada
Posts: 56
Default Re: Throwback death discussion

What an unfortunate set of events for this guy. I have heard of a few similar throwback events that happened here in BC. One guy whom I worked with (I moved to a different site 2 days before the incident). Was falling in an upper elevation block and came across a yellow cedar (Chamaecyparris nooktatensis) that was hung up in a Balsam (Abies sp.) at a 45deg angled slightly uphill. Instead of putting cuts in the trees he chose to fall another balsam (2 ft dia) into the cypress hangup and knock it out. The "pusher" was slightly uphill from the hangup and about 60-80 ft back. Seems like a pretty typical way to get rid of a minor hang up from a distance. When the pusher tree hit the cypress the top of the cypress was compressed against the holder balsam and eventually broke at 6". It shot back, the faler saw it coming but had not time to move much and kind of tried to move away sideways. He was already 12 feet from the stump he was falling, as he braced himself on the hillside the cypress top struck him on the side of the body. He had moderate injuries to his side and a completely crushed ankle which unfortunately has since ended his falling career.

The second story is pretty unreal sounding. A faller fell a cypress (yellow cedar) snag. It was small (24'' dia - 100 ft tall). The top struck a stump and shot back hitting the faller in the back of the head, breaking his neck. He survived but no more falling for him as well.

Hopefully I explained these incidents well enough and it is understandable. As far as the other guy it is hard to say whether he saw the hazard for what it was and was still running or he turned away when he saw the piece fly back at him. But I'm sure either way when the piece broke it would have come back fast too fast for most guys to make much of a move other than maybe a short jump/dive sideways or whatever. I do agree though that a faller is better off to get to his spot (predesignated as safe(relatively)) and turn to watch what is happening. Keep your head up! Cheers - Martin
Martin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th November 2009, 03:37 PM   #8
Veteran Heritage Status
 
Bruce Hopf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North of Sebringville, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,176
Default Re: Throwback death discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin View Post
What an unfortunate set of events for this guy. I have heard of a few similar throwback events that happened here in BC. One guy whom I worked with (I moved to a different site 2 days before the incident). Was falling in an upper elevation block and came across a yellow cedar (Chamaecyparris nooktatensis) that was hung up in a Balsam (Abies sp.) at a 45deg angled slightly uphill. Instead of putting cuts in the trees he chose to fall another balsam (2 ft dia) into the cypress hangup and knock it out. The "pusher" was slightly uphill from the hangup and about 60-80 ft back. Seems like a pretty typical way to get rid of a minor hang up from a distance. When the pusher tree hit the cypress the top of the cypress was compressed against the holder balsam and eventually broke at 6". It shot back, the faler saw it coming but had not time to move much and kind of tried to move away sideways. He was already 12 feet from the stump he was falling, as he braced himself on the hillside the cypress top struck him on the side of the body. He had moderate injuries to his side and a completely crushed ankle which unfortunately has since ended his falling career.

The second story is pretty unreal sounding. A faller fell a cypress (yellow cedar) snag. It was small (24'' dia - 100 ft tall). The top struck a stump and shot back hitting the faller in the back of the head, breaking his neck. He survived but no more falling for him as well.

Hopefully I explained these incidents well enough and it is understandable. As far as the other guy it is hard to say whether he saw the hazard for what it was and was still running or he turned away when he saw the piece fly back at him. But I'm sure either way when the piece broke it would have come back fast too fast for most guys to make much of a move other than maybe a short jump/dive sideways or whatever. I do agree though that a faller is better off to get to his spot (predesignated as safe(relatively)) and turn to watch what is happening. Keep your head up! Cheers - Martin
There is a term for this on the big woods, like that you are working in. I think it is Back Lash, or something to that effect. Bruce.
__________________
McCulloch chain saws
1- Pro Mac 60, 1- Pro Mac 700, 2- Mac 10-10 Automatic's, 2- Mini Mac 30's, 2- Mac 110's,
2- Mini Mac 35's, 1- Mac 140 with Automatic Chain Sharpener,
1- Pro Mac 10-10, 1- Mac Cat, 2- Eager Beaver
2.0's, 1- Mac 1-10
Stihl chain saws
2- 044's, 2- 034's, 2- 024's, 1- 064, 1- 084,
Strunk chain saws
1- Busy Beaver, 1- SpeeDemon Special
Stand Back, I Have A Very Extreme Case of CAD (Chain Saw Addiction Disorder).
Bruce Hopf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th November 2009, 03:48 PM   #9
Former Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: In the Great Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,211
Default Re: Throwback death discussion

Wow. 45 degrees and 21 feet back, from a downhill fall, should have been "safe." Felling trees is a dangerous sport. I wonder sometimes why I am still alive after 4 years of part time logging and thinning 10-120 foot trees. Some of them did not drop as planned. Some leaned and flipped back over the back cut, or rolled and barperchaired. Some just did not fall at all or got hung up in the canopy, or they leaned on another tree. Of course its not the big or complicated ones that get you, its the ones that look easy when things are going well. The 40 foot simple face cuts, back cut, pop in a wedge or two and WHAM! WTF? Some widowmaker snaps off, or the thing splits on you, or hits something else that hits you. Like what happened to this guy:

http://www.kiprc.uky.edu/projects/fa...es/97ky018.pdf
Attached Files
File Type: pdf 97ky018-logger-killed-1997-KY.pdf (20.4 KB, 38 views)

Last edited by Eric Frei; 14th November 2009 at 04:41 PM. Reason: added PDF for continuity
windthrown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th November 2009, 04:46 PM   #10
Admin - Razor sharp and independent 2 X Diploma Level 5 qualified arborist
 
Eric Frei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 12,820
Default Re: Throwback death discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by windthrown View Post
Wow. 45 degrees and 21 feet back, from a downhill fall, should have been "safe."
Yep, you'd dang well think so. That's why this is interesting. Some trees like euc grandis here have really long low limbs .... they say hind site is 20/20 vision but where does one draw the line? Had the guy been 21' away on a 30 degree angle he would have been OK.
Eric Frei is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 14th November 2009, 07:52 PM   #11
Former Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: In the Great Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,211
Default Re: Throwback death discussion

Its funny, but the more I logged, the closer I stayed to the butt of the tree. I also was more keenly aware of escape routes and always had them in my head before I cut the strap or finished a non-strapped back cut. Falling redwoods were fun. They are lighter. But as a consequence, the hingewood is not as good, so they tended to go more astray on me.

At one silviculture course I was in, the professor was an experienced logger. He said that you were not a real logger until a tree spins out of the cut and falls backward 180 degrees from where you were planning to drop the tree, and it lands dead onto where you left your chainsaw, crushing it. Then you can call yourself a logger. I have had similar things happen to me. Damn trees!
windthrown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th November 2009, 07:57 PM   #12
Bayside Tree Care Brisbane
 
Garry Brockley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Brisbane Aus
Posts: 1,649
Default Re: Throwback death discussion

I had a similar thing happen but i was a pup at the time and didnt appreciate the danger i was in. dang youngsters.
__________________
Garry Brockley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th November 2009, 05:16 PM   #13
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Duncan, BC, Canada
Posts: 56
Default Re: Throwback death discussion

We definitely need to look and try to envision as many of the hundreds or even thousands of scenarios that could go on when we're falling/climbing. Especially, out in the bush with blowdown on the ground uneven topo, weather etc. I got a picture of a cedar snag I fell a few months ago were I misread the lean along with a strong adverse wind. I eventually had to cut off the sides(only a last case resort as long as I had a good alternate escape route, no escape route would have meant stopping work and blasting the tree with Amex) and let it go over backwards. No trees behind to brush, too bad I could've pushed it. Anyways, lotgs going on out there, keep your mind on the job and head up.
PS everything went well and I got way out of there went it finally went. In the pic that is my 390 powerhead sticking out of the backcut and on the front was a 12 dia hemlock at about 12 feet and on the low side was a 21/2 ft hemlock snag. The tree was just shy of 13 ft dia.

Attached Thumbnails
Throwback death discussion-imgp3846-small-.jpg  
Martin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th November 2009, 06:16 PM   #14
Former Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: In the Great Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,211
Default Re: Throwback death discussion

I never cut anything over about 5 feet DBH myself. My longest bar is only 32 inches...
windthrown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th November 2009, 08:11 PM   #15
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Cole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Canberra
Posts: 215
Default Re: Throwback death discussion

whats five feet "DBH" mean there windy, what saw do run the 32 on

cheers cole

At one silviculture course I was in, the professor was an experienced logger. He said that you were not a real logger until a tree spins out of the cut and falls backward 180 degrees from where you were planning to drop the tree, and it lands dead onto where you left your chainsaw, crushing it. Then you can call yourself a logger. I have had similar things happen to me. Damn trees!

lol doesnt really make sence there windy a dumbass can do that without even knowing they did it. would call them a logger.....doooont think sooo
Cole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2009, 04:53 AM   #16
Mature tree
 
arborjockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: hawaii. ohio. oregon. california
Posts: 260
Default Re: Throwback death discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by windthrown View Post
Its funny, but the more I logged, the closer I stayed to the butt of the tree. I also was more keenly aware of escape routes and always had them in my head before I cut the strap or finished a non-strapped back cut. Falling redwoods were fun. They are lighter. But as a consequence, the hingewood is not as good, so they tended to go more astray on me.
I was kinda told the same thing. Stay a little closer thefore you can watch the trees action (while it fell) longer. Then in emergency take your exit route. If your back is turned while your taking your exit you dont know whats coming and you could going towards danger.


then again somtimes you gotta just go

Last edited by arborjockey; 17th November 2009 at 07:25 AM.
arborjockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2009, 11:36 AM   #17
Former Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: In the Great Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,211
Default Re: Throwback death discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cole View Post
whats five feet "DBH" mean there windy, what saw do run the 32 on

cheers cole
Er, here in the states, DBH is standard measure for the diameter of a tree. DBH stands for Diameter at Breast Height. Tits high, there sonny. Tits high. Take a logger's tape and run it around the tree at arm height, and you get the DBH. You can also eye the diameter with a tree measuring stick, but that gives you the diameter at eye level.

I run the 32 inch bar on my woods ported 044. That bar came on my 066, actually. I run it with half-skip chisel. I also run a 28 and a 25 on it with full comp chain. Here in the longbar US west coast, we do such things. The 044 is an MR model, and hence it has the high output oiler for longer bars. It also has the 3/4 wrap, and what is called here in the states, "the PNW side cover" which is the larger side cover.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cole View Post
lol doesnt really make sence there windy a dumbass can do that without even knowing they did it. would call them a logger.....doooont think sooo
Well, the point he was trying to make was that trees do not always fall as planned. And if they have all fallen perfectly for you, I would have to wonder what kind of logging you have done, and for how long. Eventually some trees are gonna baberchair, split, roll, pinch your bar, or heave over backwards. Or just sit there and do nothing, hung up in the canopy. Hell, one tree we felled in Redwood Valley, CA was a big old live oak. It was filled with water, and it just started gushing when we made the back cut. I did not expect that to happen. Never know... I always try to think, "what if it all forks up" and plan accordingly. Most times the trees fall just fine. Sometimes they don't though.
windthrown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2009, 11:43 AM   #18
Former Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: In the Great Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,211
Default Re: Throwback death discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by arborjockey View Post
I was kinda told the same thing. Stay a little closer thefore you can watch the trees action (while it fell) longer. Then in emergency take your exit route. If your back is turned while your taking your exit you dont know whats coming and you could going towards danger.
Yah, that comes with experience. Never turn your back on the tree until it is coming at you. The closer you are, the easier it is to move away from the fall. Watch the tree fall, and watch that butt if it breaks the hinge. Wear a hardhat for flying debris and any falling limbs.

Quote:
Originally Posted by arborjockey View Post
YouTube - Tree falling with dad gone wrong
then again somtimes you gotta just go
Yah, I think he got the lean figured wrong on that tree. Nice fence job. I have to wonder where he had planned to drop that thing though? Seems he was aiming 180 degrees away from the actual fall, which is toward the house, deck, etc.???
windthrown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2009, 03:15 PM   #19
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Duncan, BC, Canada
Posts: 56
Default Re: Throwback death discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by windthrown View Post
Yah, that comes with experience. Never turn your back on the tree until it is coming at you. The closer you are, the easier it is to move away from the fall. Watch the tree fall, and watch that butt if it breaks the hinge. Wear a hardhat for flying debris and any falling limbs.




Yah, I think he got the lean figured wrong on that tree. Nice fence job. I have to wonder where he had planned to drop that thing though? Seems he was aiming 180 degrees away from the actual fall, which is toward the house, deck, etc.???
I would say that you want to get at least 10 ft from the stump and heads up unless its completely not safe to do so(steep ground etc.) As you say, heads up and watch the tree once your clear(by your assessment). Always wear a hard hat of course but don;t count on it to do much from a limb falling from 50-200 ft(even a small one) watch the canopy until you know it's clear.

Looks to me like he cut off the far side and the tree split towards him on top of missing the lean and probably no wedges. It happens but shouldn't when you have an uphill lean or nice fence and house right there! Cheers, Marty
Martin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th November 2009, 02:32 AM   #20
Veteran Heritage Status
 
Bruce Hopf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North of Sebringville, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,176
Default Re: Throwback death discussion

When I was taught how to fell a tree, Especially in our bush, before we started the chain saw, we would plan our escape route, pick a tree to duck behind.
We also had a back up plan, just in case that route was taken away, in case something went wrong.
Then we would fell the tree, ans once that tree started to go, we would be on our way to the tree we picked to hide behind, and watch the tree go from there.
If tree limbs where flying, we were safe behind the tree, or if a branch would bust off, and spring, we were still safe from the tree that we where hiding behind. Still do it today.
If it is in an open field, we would get as far as possible from the tree, turn around enough time before it would hit the ground, and we could see if anything would be going wrong, and hope to get out of the way, in case something did. Bruce.
__________________
McCulloch chain saws
1- Pro Mac 60, 1- Pro Mac 700, 2- Mac 10-10 Automatic's, 2- Mini Mac 30's, 2- Mac 110's,
2- Mini Mac 35's, 1- Mac 140 with Automatic Chain Sharpener,
1- Pro Mac 10-10, 1- Mac Cat, 2- Eager Beaver
2.0's, 1- Mac 1-10
Stihl chain saws
2- 044's, 2- 034's, 2- 024's, 1- 064, 1- 084,
Strunk chain saws
1- Busy Beaver, 1- SpeeDemon Special
Stand Back, I Have A Very Extreme Case of CAD (Chain Saw Addiction Disorder).
Bruce Hopf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th November 2009, 10:54 AM   #21
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Duncan, BC, Canada
Posts: 56
Default Re: Throwback death discussion

Sounds good.
Martin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2009, 02:30 PM   #22
Mature tree
 
stirmantrees's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: oviedo, fl
Posts: 469
Default Re: Throwback death discussion

in regards to the original post it seems to have been a very unfortunate accident.
Something I do from time to time is to pre- cut some of the leads (if they are large) so that the tree will lay down flat as the pre-cut limbs hit the ground( while at the same time continue to have the weight advantage of the same limbs. I have done this very limited and mostly on small trees that are not consequential. however, it does pose some other potential problems if one is not careful.

even a 1/3 undercut can be enough for a lead to fold. I am sure many of us have had a tree that has all the weight in a favorable place but to drop the tree there is a huge lead that will cause the tree to roll and there is targets to the side.
Anyways, very useful but must be done perfectly technique. could this gut have saved his life by appying this????maybe who knows.
everyone make good decisions and dont do anything your gut is telling you is the wrong thing to do. i have read that many of deaths have been preceded by climbers stating some concern over the tree they were about to tackle. be safe

i will post some vid or pics soon.
stirmantrees is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Throwback killed this guy! Eric Frei ANNOUNCEMENTS 6 18th March 2009 10:52 PM
Amazing Saw of Death Eric Frei The Video Forum 4 24th May 2008 12:56 AM
Yet another death...... RIP TreeSpecialist General Tree Chat 6 22nd April 2008 02:19 PM
Another death TreeSpecialist General Tree Chat 6 11th April 2008 05:36 PM
death of a pioneer-climber... quercus Non Tree Related chat 3 13th January 2008 04:22 PM


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 09:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Advertising on Treeworld | Your Business Directory
TreeWorld @ 2011