Tree World  


Go Back   Tree World > All About Trees > Chainsaws

Stihl V.S. Husqavarna

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16th February 2007, 04:11 PM   #1
Sappling
 
Grizzly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: California
Posts: 45
Default Stihl V.S. Husqavarna

Since I started my somcamy, I started with a poland wild thing that went to hell in a hand basket. After seeing how big of a peice of junk it was, I purchased my first Stihl chainsaw. Thats all I been useing, but whats your opinion in contrastbetween the saws. Is a huskey as good as a stihl?
__________________
Grizzly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th February 2007, 04:39 PM   #2
Admin - Razor sharp and independent 2 X Diploma Level 5 qualified arborist
 
Eric Frei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 12,820
Default

I had a Husky 372 once, great saw whilst new but slowly dickie things kept busting.

Starter cords, rewind spring, break bands, and that stupid throttle cable plays up.

I switched to stihl and they're tougher, can take more beating.

Husky is a good product, engines go hard, if all you do is cut wood not palms I think you'll be OK
Eric Frei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th February 2007, 06:19 PM   #3
Moderator - Previously known as JayD
 
Jeff Darby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: TreeWorld, Sydney Australia
Posts: 2,031
Smile

Hi All,
We have both in our arsenal and they are both good saws, But in my opion the stihls just beat the huskys,more robust..but its up to your preferance both will get the job done..but in the long run the stihl will be still running hard...I like my stihls..just like I prefer to own a Harley over other makes but thats me, To each their own.
__________________

Member: Australian Tree Association

Join the Australian Tree Association...Have your voice heard !

Arboriculture, A life long study for some, a passing phase for others

© Jeffrey J Darby 2011
Jeff Darby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th February 2007, 07:02 PM   #4
I'm new here so be nice
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: cornwall uk
Posts: 2
Default

stihl definately make the best top handled saw, ive had mine drop from 30 ft bounced and been absolutely fine.Not quite as well balanced as the husky but built to last.My biggest saw is a husky and I love it.Basically they both make good saws.
lizardman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th February 2007, 07:06 PM   #5
Admin - Razor sharp and independent 2 X Diploma Level 5 qualified arborist
 
Eric Frei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 12,820
Default

I run that Stihl 14" lightweight bar on my 200T, nice.

I had a 335XP as well, take a 200T any day.
Eric Frei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2007, 03:08 PM   #6
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
yooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Upper Michigan U.S.A.
Posts: 128
Default

i run both cant complain about ither. although i would have to say one thing and i know somone will bitch about this,when its cold i mean real cold..-15f and thats about -26c i hav a ms192 that always runs best dont know why.compaired to the 335 and the 200. its my oldest saw and the only time i use it. If there not a husky or a sthill, ya mise well use em as a boat anker after a couple yrs!
yooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2007, 03:19 PM   #7
Sappling
 
Notahacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Longmont, CO
Posts: 16
Default

I like the lower prices of Husqvarna, however, the nearest dealer is 25 minutes away. So, way back when I was starting the business I decided to go with Stihl because I have 2 dealers in my town. I have worked with both and I like Stihl best. My favorite saw is my MS200T.
__________________
"Quality costs as much as it saves." My great uncle Simon Murphy
Notahacker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2007, 06:46 PM   #8
Mature tree
 
jim1nz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: International, Germany
Posts: 476
Default

I pref Stihl, 200t, 460, 880. Power to weight is better.

Im not getting into the whole stihl vs Husky drama, everyone to their own. Use what you want, like what you want, change if you want, its personal preference.
__________________
SPEED ALWAYS FOLLOWS TECHNIQUE
jim1nz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2007, 07:31 PM   #9
Mature tree
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 307
Default

I go with all Stihl but I do have one 3120.

I think Husky and Stihl are about even up. Dolmar is making some interesting saws too with the 5100 and 7900.
TreeCo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2007, 10:13 PM   #10
Former Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ankara, Turkey at the moment
Posts: 28
Default

Husqvarna - Swedish
Stihl - Germman

Husqvarna are the best chainsaws in my opinion, they are built so well as to be indestructable by humans.

Stihl are like typical german materialistic ideas, Mercedes like Stihl are notoriously fiddly and when they go wrong very expensive to fix.

Look at the push break on the MS660 It pushes forward over the exhaust muffler and does not work properly due to the exhaust being to close to the break. Causing the break to become soft.

Husqvarans 385xp - probably the finest chainsaw in existence
Stihl has no equivalent of this saw, ms46 too small ms660 too big.
385xp just right.

Husqvarna 272xp another great saw.
Husqvarna 254 - An arboricultural legend - Stihl took a hell of a beating with this saw.

Stihl MS200T - The ultimate treeclimbing saw, but does have a few problems, not perfect.
Iorek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2007, 10:21 PM   #11
Former Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ankara, Turkey at the moment
Posts: 28
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TreeCo View Post
Dolmar is making some interesting saws too with the 5100 and 7900.
The TreeCo man is joking right?

Dolmar making interesting Saws!

If chainsaws were reincarnated as a higher form of life - Dolmar saws would be reincarnated as Jonsered at best

Dolmar = Pretty bad saw
Iorek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2007, 02:20 AM   #12
Sappling
 
chris girard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Gilmanton, N.H. USA
Posts: 8
Default

I have used both and prefer Stihl. I run an 044 and a 200T.
chris girard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd February 2007, 12:45 PM   #13
Sappling
 
Grizzly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: California
Posts: 45
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iorek View Post
Husqvarna - Swedish
Stihl - Germman

Husqvarna are the best chainsaws in my opinion, they are built so well as to be indestructable by humans.

Stihl are like typical german materialistic ideas, Mercedes like Stihl are notoriously fiddly and when they go wrong very expensive to fix.

Look at the push break on the MS660 It pushes forward over the exhaust muffler and does not work properly due to the exhaust being to close to the break. Causing the break to become soft.

Husqvarans 385xp - probably the finest chainsaw in existence
Stihl has no equivalent of this saw, ms46 too small ms660 too big.
385xp just right.

Husqvarna 272xp another great saw.
Husqvarna 254 - An arboricultural legend - Stihl took a hell of a beating with this saw.

Stihl MS200T - The ultimate treeclimbing saw, but does have a few problems, not perfect.
I just bought my MS 660 last june and I have never had my kickback bar beome effested becuse of the muffler. Everything is tip top on that thing, een though I use it a couple times a week. When I use it, It get a workout that I couldn't put my other saws through. tried and failed. the got cloged with saw dust and didn't cut fast enough. Even though the faster you go the easier it is to have a accident, but a inch every 30 sec.
With my MS660 I can go about 6" a sec. Thats a major difference. (thats when I'm cutting down a eucalipus or two.)
__________________
Grizzly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd February 2007, 03:44 PM   #14
Admin - Razor sharp and independent 2 X Diploma Level 5 qualified arborist
 
Eric Frei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 12,820
Default

I love my Stihls, the 066 is ants pants, just love it.

I got a 46 too, why would you want something between a 46 and 66? Seems husky make lots of inbetween saws.

I run 200, 250,440/460 (palm or real tree), 660 and that's it.

I dont mill and here in suburbia seldom am I challenged by anything that the 660 cant handle.
Eric Frei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd February 2007, 07:51 PM   #15
Monument Status
 
Sean Freeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Townsville Nth Queensland & Gold Coast Sth Queensland
Posts: 1,985
Default

I don't usually post about saws but just my 2cents worth.
Have used both Husqvarna and Stihl, in forest and urban arena, have to say love Husqvarna in pine plantation with square chain fast and furious, but in the urban forest for me Stihl is the saw I would rely on, runs all day no heating problems (and it gets really hot up here!) 200T is the best climbing saw I've used, with a smaller bar it absolutely slides through smaller branches.
Felling and td's are not what I like to do but we do have to remove larger trees sometimes and we rely very, very heavily on the 090, I have never encountered such a powerful never miss a beat cutting machine as that saw.
But thats just my opinion.

SF
Sean Freeman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th February 2007, 12:01 AM   #16
Veteran Heritage Status
 
Drouin Tree Service's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,697
Default

66 is my favorite hands down,46 aint bad
Drouin Tree Service is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th February 2007, 08:13 AM   #17
Admin - Razor sharp and independent 2 X Diploma Level 5 qualified arborist
 
Eric Frei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 12,820
Default

Boa

How did you get hold of a 090 coz apparently they're not for sale through Stihl here as do not comply with Australian Standards ... NO CHAIN BRAKE! Also, wouldn't that pose a OHS issue?
Eric Frei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th February 2007, 01:19 PM   #18
Monument Status
 
Sean Freeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Townsville Nth Queensland & Gold Coast Sth Queensland
Posts: 1,985
Default

Well they're certainly were available through Stihl up here 2yrs ago, but you're right no chain brake...I'll post some shots of the beast in action. I'll have to check on how we sit re AS now you've raised that (thanks mate!) We try to control the risk by having only myself and Tim as operators, he and I tool box before we start her up, step by step what we're going to do, and ensure that everyone else in the work area knows to keep out of the danger zone.

SF
Sean Freeman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th February 2007, 07:17 PM   #19
Admin - Razor sharp and independent 2 X Diploma Level 5 qualified arborist
 
Eric Frei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 12,820
Default

To think I missed out buying one of them off Jerry B in the States for $900 USD about a year ago ... man that was a missed out deal.

That's the beast of saws, aint nothing stopping that.
Eric Frei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th February 2007, 07:38 PM   #20
Monument Status
 
Sean Freeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Townsville Nth Queensland & Gold Coast Sth Queensland
Posts: 1,985
Default

No there's no stopping it, which as you point out makes it a bit of an OH&S nightmare! Steve and I have talked about doing a bit of a test with some old chainsaw pants comparing the 090, 46, and 200T to see if there is a massive difference in how the chain gets stopped, but we're yet to find a day when we want to spend hours getting the padding out of the chain and bar! Maybe use an old pork leg for realism...

SF
Sean Freeman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th February 2007, 07:07 AM   #21
Sappling
 
Gerhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Austria
Posts: 12
Default

I like both.
Stihl is very good for felling trees.
Husqvarna is good for cuting the branches,
because the Huskys are more agile.

Oh, and the MS200T is the best tophandle saw.
__________________
www.treetec.at
Gerhard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2007, 05:45 AM   #22
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Mike Poor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Urbana, IL,usa
Posts: 69
Default

Ive run husky for 17yrs. stihl before that. I just switched to Dolmar (german.) The models 5100 and 7900 blow away anything in their class! Unbelieveable low end torque and power to wght. The 7900 has the power of a stihl ms650 with the weight of a ms440!!!
Mike Poor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd March 2007, 12:42 PM   #23
Over mature heritage tree
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 955
Default

I've been considering a Dolmar.

My favorite climbing saw is a ported Husky 346XP with a 14" titanium carving bar and an 8-pin sprocket. That firecracker is just so much fun to use, just sizzles through everything. Weighs a bit more than a top-handle, but not a whole lot. It's not a saw that you use one-handed, but you're not supposed to do that anyway.

If I was to go back to a top-handled saw, Stihl ms 200.

I like them all, as long as they do what they're supposed to.
Tree Machine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th March 2007, 07:28 AM   #24
Mature tree
 
TREE-SURFER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Isle of Man,UK.
Posts: 337
Default

What price is every one paying for the ms200t. Here I can get 1 for ?450GBP.
My best saw is an 039 with a 22" bar. loads of grunt.
__________________
The Aerial Arborist
Isle of Man Tree Surgeon| All Aspects of Tree Work

What experts say about TOPPING
TREE-SURFER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th March 2007, 10:45 AM   #25
Sappling
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: england
Posts: 16
Default

At the moment i would not buy another stihl, but that sounds reasonable..........there carbs are crap at moment, i know of 0ne ms 200 thats had four carbs in a year.my latest stihl purchase required a new carb after half a tank ...........go to your dealer and have a look ,bet hes got a ton of 200ts awaiting carbs other wise hes lieing ..........338 i will be giving a go next,must admit i tryed huskys first ofering and it was a joke but from what ive heard it seems an improvement on the 200t now they have ironed out the faults.but change the bar!!!!!!!!is the word.
matty f is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th March 2007, 07:08 PM   #26
Admin - Razor sharp and independent 2 X Diploma Level 5 qualified arborist
 
Eric Frei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 12,820
Default

Where abouts are you Matty?

Apparently there's about 4 different carbs Stihl use and the USA gets the tighest ones on emmisions.

AN ole carb from pre 2000 is best. But it could be a local issue for you.
Eric Frei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th March 2007, 05:35 AM   #27
Sappling
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: england
Posts: 16
Default

the uk eric..... ive been told by a dealer are latest spec carbs are from a new factory in china that uses crap alloys for production....or so he says..would make sense to me,the prices are sky high and they have there market pretty much sown up... so some bright spark probably has decided to max profits up by compromising quality...uhmm enough of my stihl rants ...ill be getting sued next!
matty f is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th March 2007, 08:58 AM   #28
Admin - Razor sharp and independent 2 X Diploma Level 5 qualified arborist
 
Eric Frei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 12,820
Default

I replaced a carby a while back, got a new one from USA and the saw ran sweet ever since.

That old carby I stripped and rebuilt 5 times, dealer had it twice I think.

The saw had a flat spot just as you hit the throttle and it would die, then be a bugger to start.

Anyway, I sent it over to ole Al Smith just so he could see what was going on out of curiosity. Ends up it had a hairline crack thru it that would expand when hot and run lean. That totally supports your experience as it would have been the alloy casting fault.

My brand new 200T had it's own unusual carby problem. The throttle linkage would get caught on the carby and lock onto high revs! This saw was like this new. As I bought it from USA I just got some long nose pliers and rebent the throttle linkage ... but I had to strip the carby off to do it. So something is definately changing.

I prefer my old 200T @ 2001/2002 to the new 2006 one. It somehow just feels better, tougher. The new one broke a starter cord like within a month, the old one had only done that after a year. There's something changed for sure.

The old one is bogged up with Selley's knead it epoxy compound to stop oil leaking out etc from cutting palms. I just cant put it out of it's misery coz it goes so hard and smooth, but it does have a replacement USA carby on it 2005/2006.

But I must say, after a husky 335 I'll take the 200T with it's problems any day.
Eric Frei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th March 2007, 12:21 PM   #29
Sappling
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: england
Posts: 16
Default

well i got a 357xpg to replae my ms360 that seemed to last forever...and i have to say i thought i would regret it but whooa what a saw.....makes me think the new 338 could be a worthy cheaper investment, but i should get atleast another 6 months out my 200t thats running kinda ok.
matty f is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st March 2007, 12:44 PM   #30
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Albany, New York
Posts: 119
Default

I prefer husky 3120 for my top handle (pruning only saw)
allmarktree is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT +11. The time now is 06:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Advertising on Treeworld | Your Business Directory
TreeWorld @ 2011