Tree World  


Go Back   Tree World > All About Trees > Non Tree Related chat

US Study questions if pets make owners healthier

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 4th August 2011, 09:08 AM   #1
Admin - Owner Palm & Tree Services in Brisbane
 
Eric Frei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 12,993
Default US Study questions if pets make owners healthier

Pets making owners healthier questioned | News.com.au

Quote:
August 04, 2011
PET owners have long been encouraged to think that they are happier, healthier and live longer than people without pets, but a new US study claims they might be barking up the wrong tree.

Howard Herzog, a professor of psychology at Western Carolina University, says studies conducted in the past to determine whether having a pet improves health and longevity have "produced a mishmash of conflicting results".

"While pets are undoubtedly good for some people, there is presently insufficient evidence to support the contention that pet owners are healthier or happier or that they live longer" than people without pets, Prof Herzog wrote in the August issue of Current Directions in Psychological Science.

"While some researchers have reported that positive effects accrue from interacting with animals, others have found that the health and happiness of pet owners is no better, and in some cases worse, than that of non-pet owners."

Prof Herzog cites several studies purportedly showing the benefits of having a pet, including one from 1980 which showed that heart attack victims who had a pet were around four times more likely than petless victims to survive for a year after the crisis, but said more gloomy studies had been ignored.

"While the media abounds with stories extolling the health benefits of pets, studies in which pet ownership has been found to have no impact or even negative effects on human physical or mental health rarely make headlines," he said.

One study conducted last year found that pet owners were more likely than non-owners of pets to die or suffer another heart attack within a year of suffering a first crisis. That survey got no media coverage, Prof Herzog says.

He cited another study which found no difference in blood pressure between older pet-owners and the petless. In fact, the pet owners in that study exercised less than the non-owners and were more likely to be overweight.

Moreover, he said pets - which can be found in two-thirds of US households - bring with them a "cornucopia" of health problems that can be transmitted to humans such as giardia, salmonella poisoning, skin mites and worms.

Other large-scale studies conducted in the United States, Australia, Sweden and Finland also appeared to show few benefits to physical or psychological health from pet ownership, according to Prof Herzog.

The professor, a pet owner himself, stressed he was not condemning pet ownership or the use of therapy animals for children with autism or people with psychological disorders, but wanted to see more scientific research done.

Until that research is completed, "the existence of a pet effect on human health and happiness remains a hypothesis in need of confirmation rather than an established fact", he says.
Eric Frei is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 4th August 2011, 01:11 PM   #2
Veteran Heritage Status
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,557
Default Re: US Study questions if pets make owners healthier

It seems to me, that the crucial part of pet ownership and the happiness of the owner and the pet has been ignored, or not thought of. And that is whether the owner wants the pet, and makes that pet a highly desired family member that cannot be dismissed merely because the animal is a pet.

I have seen may people walk a dog for 5 min, and when the pee or pooh is done, take the animal back inside. The walk is primarily for the animal, your benefit is a bonus. And a minimum of a one hour walk in the morning, and evening, with at least 2-3 10-15 min walks thru the day is necessary for the pets' health, for exercise, a good life, and bonding with the owner(s). This is mostly for dogs - not too many cats walk on a leash. After all, for many people the dog(s) replaces the kid(s), and caring people try to spend as much time with their kids as possible, so the same should hold true for pets.

If the owner doesn't want the pet - gotten as a gift or hand-me-down, there can be no positive health benefit.. Most of the studies I have seen -- whether talking about pets, or peoples' health, never concern themselves with how the participants feel. It is prob considered too difficult to quantify, and is not consistently reproducible..
__________________
My business: Tree Pruning and Removals -- Strump Removals -- Advice -- Consulting -- Arborist Reports
Consulting Forester
If you want an honest opinion, call Brent Ferris...because, Trees want to Live Too !
We do great jobs, even in small yards.

Free Estimates Oakville to Oshawa - North to Bradford (Will travel further if cost of travelling covered)
Cell 416-460-5704
Brent Ferris is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
make 066 better 066logger Chainsaws 4 28th January 2010 02:05 PM
Help all bc 2000 owners soutz Tree machinery and equipment 43 2nd July 2009 11:49 AM
Further study in Arboriculture in Oz? JOZ General Tree Chat 1 15th June 2009 11:21 PM
How do we make it better?? OutofMytree General Tree Chat 3 10th November 2008 08:43 AM
Make a hit! Drouin Tree Service Non Tree Related chat 4 11th January 2008 07:00 PM


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 06:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Advertising on Treeworld
TreeWorld @ 2012