Tree World  


Go Back   Tree World > All About Trees > Non Tree Related chat

Fake Christmas trees worse than natural ones

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10th December 2009, 06:00 PM   #1
Admin - Razor sharp and independent 2 X Diploma Level 5 qualified arborist
 
Eric Frei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 12,820
Default Fake Christmas trees worse than natural ones

Well, about time some-one gets up and says kill a tree rather buy a fake one.

Plastic Christmas trees 'bad for environment'


Quote:
Plastic Christmas trees 'bad for environment'
MEX COOPER
December 10, 2009 - 4:17PM


By choosing a plastic Christmas tree you could be decking your halls with gas and carbon.

Fake trees lead to the emission of more than double the greenhouse gases of a natural one, according to Victorian Environment and Climate Change Minister Gavin Jennings.

Mr Jennings said emissions from plastic trees were generated during manufacturing, transportation and from the materials used including, PVC, steel and in some cases lead.

Plastic stands used to hold up natural Christmas trees also leave an environmental footprint but it is offset by the carbon soaked up by the trees during their time in the ground.

Natural trees can also be recyled through green waste collections while artificial trees usually end up in landfill.

Mr Jennings said a family would have to keep a plastic tree for at least 20 years to to balance out the 8.1 kilograms of CO2 it would have caused to be emitted each year, compared to 3.1 kilograms for a natural tree.

He urged manufacturers to develop recyclable fake trees.

But for Victorians dreaming of a truly green Christmas, decorating a living potted tree is the most environmentally friendly option.

Mr Jennings suggested buying a potted Wollemi Pine, an endangered species, to be used each year as a Christmas tree.

"You can save the environment, protect an endangered Australian tree and have a great Christmas all at the same time," he said.

Environment Victoria sustainable living project officer Domenica Settle backed the idea of using a living tree.

She said there were many ways to reduce the impact Christmas has on the environment.

Ms Settle said choosing durable decorations or even making popcorn strings was preferable to cheap plastic trinkets.

Environment Vicotria has produced a guide to having a green festive season -

Our guide to greening up the festive season | Environment Victoria
Eric Frei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th December 2009, 08:52 PM   #2
Over mature heritage tree
 
jmcg.insight.gardens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Mannering Park, Australia
Posts: 623
Default Re: Fake Christmas trees worse than natural ones

lol,

have they just figured it out?

Could be something in it in the future for you Arborists, imagine the
Wollemi's planted in the back yard when they get sick of watering them.
jmcg.insight.gardens is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th December 2009, 07:34 AM   #3
Mature tree
 
LeifR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Norway
Posts: 285
Default Re: Fake Christmas trees worse than natural ones



Real trees are of course better!
Leif
Attached Thumbnails
Fake Christmas trees worse than natural ones-604633_h465bf30d6233566e32d1_672x.jpg  
__________________

My place - Bjørndalen.
http://www.youtube.com/user/MultiVoff
LeifR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th December 2009, 10:03 PM   #4
Over mature heritage tree
 
jmcg.insight.gardens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Mannering Park, Australia
Posts: 623
Default Re: Fake Christmas trees worse than natural ones

Hi LeifR

looks like your in the land of the Christmas tree.

Some of the trees behind your place look awesome.

Here in Australia I feel no remorse when I cut down a Pinus radiata from our surrounding bushland for a Christmas tree, they are feral here.

Lets face it, when a real tree is in the house it smells like Christmas.

regards Julie
jmcg.insight.gardens is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th December 2009, 05:20 AM   #5
Mature tree
 
LeifR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Norway
Posts: 285
Default Re: Fake Christmas trees worse than natural ones

Hi, Julie.
Thanks for reply. Perhaps we may say that Norway (among others) is a land of the Christmas tree. It's a nice view to look at the wood with new fallen snow.
Old Christmas cards were idyllic with snow, wood or trees, birds, a small cottage with smoke from the chimney, horses, sledges and gnomes.
I was looking for an old card with people bringing the Christmas tree home from the wood using horse and sledge. But the only one I found was this one with a gnome and his dog. I think it must be a low-emission equipage?

The trees behind the white house are Norwegian spruce, Picea abies. They are too big for for my home. Trafalgar Square-size or something like that. I have milled a lot of them to planks.
Here we have no bushland, or "no mans land" without any special owner. All wood belongs to someone. So, people have to ask the owner before they cut down a tree. (Or at least, they ought to!)

I remember very well Christmas as a boy in the white house that belonged to my grand parents. Real candles on the tree, with stearin dripping down on the gifts under the tree.

Merry Christmas! Leif.

Edit: Link to another thread with Christmas traditions from my place: Norwegian Christmas food traditions.
__________________

My place - Bjørndalen.
http://www.youtube.com/user/MultiVoff
LeifR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th December 2009, 10:31 PM   #6
Over mature heritage tree
 
jmcg.insight.gardens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Mannering Park, Australia
Posts: 623
Default Re: Fake Christmas trees worse than natural ones

hi LeifR

I read your link and posted there, made me hungry.

Picea abies is a beautiful tree my grandmother is always talking of the Beauty of the forests in her homeland Lithuania. I have an excellent book on it.

Will be doing the traditional Christmas with her again this year.

regards Julie
jmcg.insight.gardens is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th December 2009, 06:26 AM   #7
Mature tree
 
LeifR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Norway
Posts: 285
Default Re: Fake Christmas trees worse than natural ones



Norwegian spruce as Christmas tree at Trafalgar Square. About 25 metres high, definitely not fake.
Cut down near the city of Trondheim and transported across the North sea by ship. A tradition since 1947.




Norwegian spruce by Brandenburger Tor in Berlin. Not fake this either.
Link to more pics.
http://www.oslo.diplo.de/Vertretung/...otogaleri.html

This tradition is much younger, 17 years, I think. A couple of years ago the needles fell off before Christmas. The reason was suspected to be storm during the voyage. The salt made the needles fall off.



It was a bit tricky to take down this tree (biggest right) behind the cabin. They always use mobile crane, of course.

Leif.
Attached Thumbnails
Fake Christmas trees worse than natural ones-tccfp5som2xedfd86in-uwtjhd8xlbcksmauen2nfkuw.jpg   Fake Christmas trees worse than natural ones-juletre__bilde-property-galeriebild__gross.jpg   Fake Christmas trees worse than natural ones-bilde.jpg  
__________________

My place - Bjørndalen.
http://www.youtube.com/user/MultiVoff

Last edited by LeifR; 14th December 2009 at 09:38 AM.
LeifR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th December 2009, 08:38 AM   #8
Veteran Heritage Status
 
Apocalypsse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Victoria, Australia
Posts: 1,154
Default Re: Fake Christmas trees worse than natural ones

That news article is just as bad as the one in The Age today saying Australian scientists have discovered that ripping a bandaid off quickly causes less pain...
Apocalypsse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th December 2009, 08:35 AM   #9
Over mature heritage tree
 
clementine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Shropshire, UK
Posts: 509
Default Re: Fake Christmas trees worse than natural ones

Carbon Footprint Study Finds Artificial Christmas Trees Best for the Environment....


Owning an artificial Christmas tree is healthier for the environment over a 10 year period than using real trees.

The environmental study found that a consumer using an average artificial Christmas tree has a significantly smaller carbon footprint than a consumer using average farm-grown Christmas trees.

The in-depth analysis studied both real and artificial Christmas trees from "cradle to grave" over a 10-year use period. This included analyzing each stage of the life cycle of natural Christmas trees, from seedling through commercial farming, cultivation and harvesting, transport to retail, transport to consumer homes, and finally transport and disposal. The study also examined the manufacturing of an artificial tree including resource harvesting, raw material transport, each stage of the manufacturing process, transport to retail, transport to consumer homes, and finally transport and disposal.

The study was based on the North American consumer and compared the most commonly sold 6' artificial Christmas tree, manufactured in China, to 6' real Christmas trees grown locally in the United States.

The study, sponsored by the American Christmas Tree Association and conducted by leading international sustainability firm PE Americas, found that the most significant contribution to global warming came from fossil fuel consumption in transportation of real Christmas trees from tree farms and lots to consumer homes. The study also indicated that driving out to a tree farm and cutting down a tree is the worst environmental choice you can make when buying a Christmas tree and that it's substantially better for the environment to buy a tree from a local retailer rather than to drive out to a farm, due to the incremental fossil fuel consumed.

The environmental study found that the best way to reduce one's carbon footprint is to choose an artificial Christmas tree and to use it for ten or more years. If consumers use an artificial tree for just one year and then throw it away, then there is no benefit. Of course, in today's economy, it's much more likely that consumers will invest in something that will last. Not only is investing in an artificial Christmas tree a wise financial investment, it also reduces global warming and other environmental impacts at the same time.



We've had our artificial tree for 5 years now, still looks like new
__________________
Meddle not in the affairs of dragons - for you are crunchy and taste of chicken!
clementine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th December 2009, 12:42 PM   #10
Admin - Razor sharp and independent 2 X Diploma Level 5 qualified arborist
 
Eric Frei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 12,820
Default Re: Fake Christmas trees worse than natural ones

Well, I have never had a real one in the house ever.

Pine trees around here, well, not many and you could get a branch off an elliottii but it's messy.

The study says that transport is the most co2 emitting thing, based in USA. It also seemed to say that people drive out to nab a single tree. Maybe they are making an outing of an event, so not all of that co2 emitted was for a christmas tree but for a social outing .... and then if they had a coal fired BBQ in the woods it would be so much better.

Wonder if they calculated in the transport costs for all those Chinese fake trees. What about the additional health care costs of those Americans going to the local mall eating all those donuts and cream while they are there, I suppose that's offset by the heavier breathing (expelling more co2) the hikers are doing in their physical expedition to nab a pine tree in the woods.

Eric Frei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th December 2009, 11:35 PM   #11
Over mature heritage tree
 
jmcg.insight.gardens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Mannering Park, Australia
Posts: 623
Default Re: Fake Christmas trees worse than natural ones

Quote:
I suppose that's offset by the heavier breathing (expelling more co2) the hikers are doing in their physical expedition to nab a pine tree in the woods.
I hadn't thought of that, I'll have to breath lightly.

Julie
jmcg.insight.gardens is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th December 2009, 04:42 AM   #12
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Treeson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 177
Default Re: Fake Christmas trees worse than natural ones

in NZ we would nab the top off a youngish pine from the plantation down the road, quiclky chuck it in the van and scarpa home surprising mum in the morning with a tree in the lounge.

Cant be theft if there's no trace!
Treeson is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CO2 emmisions getting worse, 3x worse! Eric Frei Non Tree Related chat 25 27th April 2011 05:16 AM
What type of trees make natural canopies? heimdale General Tree Chat 0 18th November 2009 02:50 PM
fake trees treevet Ask an Arborist here 1 26th September 2009 09:06 AM
Christmas trees: Real vs. artificial vs. eco-friendly Knotahippie General Tree Chat 3 3rd December 2008 05:06 AM
Convert me from Natural crotch to Arbor block Col2y Climbing - Gear, Ropes, Knots & Rigging 22 18th April 2008 07:53 PM


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 02:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Advertising on Treeworld | Your Business Directory
TreeWorld @ 2011