Tree World  


Go Back   Tree World > All About Trees > Non Tree Related chat

Climate Change | Global Warming | BS or not?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 5th June 2009, 09:01 PM   #31
Veteran Heritage Status
 
Galbee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Brisbane Aus
Posts: 1,189
Default Re: Climate Change | Global Warming | BS or not?

very professionally and eloquently put, so nice to have another sensible voice on here.
__________________
In the land of the blind, the man with one eye is king
Galbee is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Propeller this post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 5th June 2009, 09:50 PM   #32
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: western Maine, USA
Posts: 59
Default Re: Climate Change | Global Warming | BS or not?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Tooley View Post
For years I questioned the issue of crude oil being a fossil fuel, because at the extreme depths which oil is found, and the regions where these deposits are located..couldn't have come from prehistoric plant remains, and now the new findings are that crude oil is most likely a percolated hydrocarbon.
I hadn't heard of this. This new theory, does it mean it percolated down to where it is from the surface. Do they suggest how it originated?

Many years ago I read Immanuel Velikovsky's "Worlds in Collision" in which he theorized that hydrocarbons rained onto the earth from celestial bodies and sank into the ground. That idea made oil spills seem like a temporary disaster.

I found his books very interesting, but he was rejected by the status quo who refused to believe that cataclysmic events could happen to earth. He also postulated that the dinosaurs were wiped out by such major celestial disruptions. Personally, I find no problem with the idea of both steady state change and sudden dramatic change.

Twenty years or so ago when Time magazine had a cover story about dinosaurs being wiped out by a collision with another celestial body, not one mention was made of Velikovsky, who wrote exactly that in the late 1940's.

I do know for sure that all the astronomy books used to call Venus our sister planet, the most likely to have life etc. Science fiction often featured Venusians. I just saw one of those astronomy books recently, written in the 60's.

Velikovsky however wrote that Venus would be 600 or 800 degrees (I read this 30 years ago, can't remember the exact numbers) with an atmosphere not supportive of life as we know it. His idea was rejected out of hand.

When our first probe reached Venus we found it to be as Velikovsky predicted. His name was never mentioned. We quietly forgot all about the "sister planet" and now pretend we always knew what Venus was like.

"Science" is really about money, power, grants, prestige, established structures. It is not about the search for truth.
stargazer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Propeller this post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 5th June 2009, 10:50 PM   #33
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Bob Tooley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Scarborough, Maine USA
Posts: 128
Default Re: Climate Change | Global Warming | BS or not?

While I don't research the sciences too deeply because it tends to confuse things more then explain them,... my understanding of the crude oil is that it requires certain rock and mineral layers to be present between the oil deposit and the surface water, and as the water seeps down through these layers it mixes with the surface components, ending up in the crude oil reserve. I guess sort of like a giant coffee maker...

Here's another thing for you to work on...it's another theory I've been hording, "lower tree limb-loss isn't caused from the lack of light at these lower levels..."
Apply the Second Law of Thermodynamics, a simple earth science law which the physics science coveted a number of years ago, but has applications in almost all other science fields...stating; "an area of higher concentration will always seek an area of lower concentration"...
The way I look at a number of things is...'the answers aren't in the complexities of the solutions, but rather they are in the simplicity of the problem itself'...

You'll find everything quoted today has been presented before, but for lack of popularity, wasn't in it's own time. Darwin's theories, species evolutions/extinctions, and moving continents...Eastern Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Maine didn't even exist until North America collided with Africa.. so we now live in a state which is made up of a bunch of 'snow plowed' islands picked up along the way. The difficult part for science and research is the unwritten,...but politically and publicly supported principle of ..."never go against tradition"...don't confuse the already confused and choose your timing for it's presentation very carefully. Don't tread on the infamous "PHD" status of the people who, at one particular time in their entire life had the knowledge to pass an exam,.. and now 'hide behind it'... Most 'smart' people don't even know they are smart because they've never been given an exam, or achieved a 'score'...they just go about their daily routine... yet they actually know more then those who wave the knowledge flag in everyone's face...

Last edited by Bob Tooley; 6th June 2009 at 03:51 AM. Reason: added info
Bob Tooley is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Propeller this post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 6th June 2009, 08:42 PM   #34
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: western Maine, USA
Posts: 59
Default Re: Climate Change | Global Warming | BS or not?

Well, I can understand the "giant coffee maker" part!!
stargazer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Propeller this post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 6th June 2009, 11:37 PM   #35
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Bob Tooley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Scarborough, Maine USA
Posts: 128
Default Re: Climate Change | Global Warming | BS or not?

Oh come on, you know the other theory too..you're just not realizing it... If one large tree loses it's lower leaves and limbs due to lack of light in a forested area, how come the younger trees of the same species can find sufficient light to grow under them ? The water in the ground is the area of higher concentration and the trees location determines it's own specific areas of lower concentration....In a drought period, trees retain their uppermost leaves because the top is the area of the most moisture-loss...the area of the lowest concentration, and they will be the first served...other lower leaves will be served or supplied on an 'as-can' basis depending on the water available...
It follows the same principle commonly used to explain osmosis, so the 'action' is well recognized, but what I'm trying to figure out is how the distribution to certain locations within the tree are determined. Commercially this issue has no value, but it's one of those 'unknowns' that tend to bug me because the current explanations don't evenly line up with other visible and recognizable facts...'If we knew everything, this world wouldn't be much fun'...
Bob Tooley is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Propeller this post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2009, 10:15 AM   #36
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: western Maine, USA
Posts: 59
Default Re: Climate Change | Global Warming | BS or not?

OK, I understand you now. You are suggesting a principle that is the mechanism bringing the juice to the upper branches. And trees growing out in the open would keep their lower branches because they are subject to almost the same exposure as the upper branches.

I was partly joking that I could only understand coffee, since I read your post a bit after 5 AM on a Saturday.

Here is yet another example of global warming today, from Accu weather:

"Snow Today, Saturday, June 6, 2009

Sorry to say, but it is so. Snow fell on Saturday over select localities of Montana and North Dakota. In Montana, snow fell at Great Falls and Cut Bank and, in the morning, left a wintry sight on the eastern side of Glacier National Park.
Far to the east, snow fell heavily and laid on the ground at Dickinson in southwestern North Dakota, where the temperature hovered near freezing in the late morning. Hard to believe on a date when the record high, set in 1952, is 100 degrees!
Through Saturday night and into the day on Sunday, cold air more befitting April than June will slide southward into the northern Plains. It will be cold enough for some of the widespread rain wetting the northern Rockies and the northern Plains to mix with or switch to snow. Thus, there could be more "surprise" snowfalls, even with summer only to weeks away."

I hope we don't get any more frost warnings here, too much of my garden is up, too hard to cover the sensitive plants.
stargazer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Propeller this post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2009, 11:44 AM   #37
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Bob Tooley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Scarborough, Maine USA
Posts: 128
Default Re: Climate Change | Global Warming | BS or not?

You've got the principle of the theory I've been trying to work out, and I'll go into it in more detail via a different thread because this one is primarily for Global Warming...

I don't believe weather-bursts and periodic alterations in weather patterns are too alarming, or a direct sign of a Globe-wide crisis... In the late 1800's, Maine had a frost every month through the summer, and I think it was the same time as the Irish famine in Europe.... Both had high commercial impacts, but I wonder if we'd be looking at this weather change we're in now a little differently if heating oil was $ 0.18 per gallon...I think much of the 'pressure' most people are feeling isn't from the differences these changes will make in nature and the natural events as they are by how much it's now going to cost financially to over come them in heating expenses...

I'm not going to pretend to know the exact facts, but it's claimed the last ice age was not the first, and they occur every 12K years or so, but each new ice shield erasers the evidence of the previous one's.. Personally, I feel it's quite arrogant to believe we humans have the ability to alter a mass the size of the earth, and it's surrounding atmosphere, in a one hundred year period.. to the point of creating a critical mass... We are more like fleas on a dog's back...we 'bother' him, but we're not going to control the whole dog..
I'll give us credit for our abilities to create problems...but not 'that' much !
Bob Tooley is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Propeller this post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2009, 10:33 PM   #38
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: western Maine, USA
Posts: 59
Default Re: Climate Change | Global Warming | BS or not?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Tooley View Post
I'm not going to pretend to know the exact facts, but it's claimed the last ice age was not the first, and they occur every 12K years or so, but each new ice shield erasers the evidence of the previous one's.. Personally, I feel it's quite arrogant to believe we humans have the ability to alter a mass the size of the earth, and it's surrounding atmosphere, in a one hundred year period.. to the point of creating a critical mass... We are more like fleas on a dog's back...we 'bother' him, but we're not going to control the whole dog..
I'll give us credit for our abilities to create problems...but not 'that' much !
I like your "flea on a dog" analogy.

I'm a lot more afraid of global cooling than global warming. Another ice age? No thanks! I like warm weather and growing food, and trees.

Right now we are having a great display of noctilucent clouds. They are very high, way above normal weather (50 miles up -85 kilometers), so they glow with sunlight long into the evening. They must also reflect solar energy away before it can help keep us warm. Here is a quote from "Space Weather" about enjoying seeing these clouds:

"The weeks ahead could be even better. There is a well-known correlation between noctilucent clouds (NLCs) and the solar cycle: NLC activity tends to peak during years of solar minimum, possibly because low solar activity allows the upper atmosphere to cool, promoting the growth of ice crystals that make up the clouds. With a century-class solar minimum underway, the stage is set for NLCs."

Of course, the solar minimum has other effects, all of them cooling.

Last edited by stargazer; 8th June 2009 at 01:08 AM.
stargazer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Propeller this post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2009, 11:42 PM   #39
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Bob Tooley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Scarborough, Maine USA
Posts: 128
Default Re: Climate Change | Global Warming | BS or not?

I have a place in Florida I go to from November-to-late May so I can extend the 'too-short' Maine summers out a little further.

I don't believe 'anything' is going to happen with any marked changes within the next 500 years or more because 'nothing' in nature happens very fast... We've learned to condense geological time by watching too many movies where everything has to occur before you get too bored to watch it any longer... Reality is, the effects won't even be realized because they will happen so slowly that one will already be common-place before the next even starts being recognized...
Bob Tooley is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Propeller this post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2009, 11:53 PM   #40
Admin - Dip Arb & Hort & Seldom Wrong
 
Ekka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 9,789
Default Re: Climate Change | Global Warming | BS or not?

Very well said.
Ekka is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Propeller this post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2009, 03:44 AM   #41
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Bob Tooley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Scarborough, Maine USA
Posts: 128
Default Re: Climate Change | Global Warming | BS or not?

If the sun is a "Ball of Fire", the third rock from it is the "Ball of Fear"... This entire world has gone straight away from the joy of living to the fear of dying, and as far as I'm concerned...thinking along those lines means we're already dead. Trust is right out the door, and a man's castle is now the man's prison... We've been led so far down the yellow brick road with almost every issue the media want's to lead us with, the road back isn't even there anymore...and 'no',..."I don't think we're in Kansas anymore Toto...".

One of the problems is...we've become so ingrained with all these fear-messages... people now even 'fear' getting away from them.. No one looks for the things that make them happy anymore, but rather for all the reasons to 'fear' doing them. People have become so scared to make a move for fear of rejection, liability and the rest of the list is as long as your arm, so no one 'dares' do or say a thing... It's a sad state of affairs, but Global Warming is, ..."just another fear to dwell on"... it'll never effect you in your lifetime, but it is a useful 'fear', and if you're down a quart..it'll do until something else you can drive yourself crazy with comes along....

FDR said, "You have nothing to fear, but fear itself"...and maybe it's time we started hearing that message and get on with living enjoyably again...Hell, you're going to die someday anyway..you might just as well live until that day comes....
Bob Tooley is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Propeller this post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 9th June 2009, 04:06 AM   #42
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Bob Tooley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Scarborough, Maine USA
Posts: 128
Default Re: Climate Change | Global Warming | BS or not?

Stargazer,

I was wondering, is that a Carl Sagan thing, and are you into 'star gazing' ? I have a few meteorites in my rock and fossil collection which I prize because they are older then the earth and when you hold something that old, and from 'way out there' in your hand...there's a certain 'uniqueness' to it... We can go over to a general BS thread sometime and jaw jack sometime...
Bob Tooley is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Propeller this post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10th June 2009, 12:07 AM   #43
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: western Maine, USA
Posts: 59
Default Re: Climate Change | Global Warming | BS or not?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Tooley View Post
If the sun is a "Ball of Fire", the third rock from it is the "Ball of Fear"... This entire world has gone straight away from the joy of living to the fear of dying, and as far as I'm concerned...thinking along those lines means we're already dead. Trust is right out the door, and a man's castle is now the man's prison... We've been led so far down the yellow brick road with almost every issue the media want's to lead us with, the road back isn't even there anymore...and 'no',..."I don't think we're in Kansas anymore Toto...".

One of the problems is...we've become so ingrained with all these fear-messages... people now even 'fear' getting away from them.. No one looks for the things that make them happy anymore, but rather for all the reasons to 'fear' doing them. People have become so scared to make a move for fear of rejection, liability and the rest of the list is as long as your arm, so no one 'dares' do or say a thing... It's a sad state of affairs, but Global Warming is, ..."just another fear to dwell on"... it'll never effect you in your lifetime, but it is a useful 'fear', and if you're down a quart..it'll do until something else you can drive yourself crazy with comes along....

FDR said, "You have nothing to fear, but fear itself"...and maybe it's time we started hearing that message and get on with living enjoyably again...Hell, you're going to die someday anyway..you might just as well live until that day comes....
Excellent post, Bob. Poetic, philosophical, insightful, and humorous. "Ball of Fear"... Maybe you should become a writer! I think you hit the nail on the head with that fear thing, "from the joy of living to the fear of dying", "a man's castle is now the man's prison".

Brave men and women overcame their fears and fought and died to preserve out freedoms, now we are ready to give them up to anyone who promises "safety". We need a bogeyman so we can pay for our "security" by giving up power and money. Global warming is perfect. The bogeyman that lives in your imagination is scarier than one you can see and deal with. Hitler made a big mistake when he used people that could be your neighbor for the bogeyman. Now the whole world is in fearful agreement on global warming. Big improvement for the command and control forces.

The media is waiting for a heat wave on the east coast so they can rant about global warming again. They must be very disappointed that the winter before last was the biggest in many years, last summer was very cool and rainy, last winter was extra cold and steady, and this summer just won't get started. People are beginning to look forward to a little global warming! I need to replant my winter squash and watermelons. Might be too late, but we've been too cool for the ones that I planted earlier.

No "Carl Sagan" thing for me. I read something by him in the early seventies and did not like him. I thought he was likable, but misguided and a bit self righteous. I no longer remember the details, just that I have an aversion to him, or rather, to his ideas.

But I do still remember the first time I looked up at the stars! Back when being carried by adults seemed normal. Got my first telescope at about 5 or 6 yrs. old. Just got my newest and probably final telescope this spring. Twenty inch diameter f4.2 mirror, from Intermountain Optics (high quality glass). Yes, I like stargazing. I like to see the awesomeness of the universe directly. I'm also still immersed in the joy of living.

Edit: Meteorites! That is exciting! I used to go to the museum and look with lust at their meteorites. I had a couple of chips (mini meteorites) that I got at the meteor crator in Arizona, but I abandoned them when I left home as a young adult.
stargazer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Propeller this post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10th June 2009, 12:55 AM   #44
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Bob Tooley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Scarborough, Maine USA
Posts: 128
Default Re: Climate Change | Global Warming | BS or not?

Horticulture is actually my second career..I spent fourteen years as the Chief Deputy of Knox County and three years as a trooper in the Ellsworth District, so 'fear' is something I can't quite relate to.. I see it 'everywhere' and I just can't seem to understand why it becomes such a compelling force within the people who are educated enough to know the difference. You hear...."I can't" from more people who have never even tried to see.."if they could", and the same number who do 'nothing' for fear they'll make a mistake if they do 'anything'. People say their lives are 'empty', but I don't know who the hell they think is going to fill it up..maybe more channels on the cable tv systems.. In 2007, I was part of the Maine West Nile control program, and 'no one' was going into the State Parks for fear they'd get it. I blame the media for sensationalizing the problem...and the State for not presenting the 'real facts' on the matter, but just like in a courtroom... once the word is spoken...no amount of.. 'strike that from the record',.. is ever going to clear it from the people's minds. I think it's time people flushed out their heads and started out with a fresh thought process before they start filling it up again. Look at the statistics a little closer and don't imagine you're going to be one of them, but rather..that you're 'not' going to be one... Optimism -vs- pessimism ..........Positive -vs- Negative...etc.,
Bob Tooley is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Propeller this post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 13th June 2009, 02:47 AM   #45
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: western Maine, USA
Posts: 59
Default Re: Climate Change | Global Warming | BS or not?

Just ran across a news item that sounds so much like Velikovsky's ideas. No Mention of his name, however.

We seem to be moving in his direction. Critics said planets could "not" alter there course and cause havoc. He said that they caused havoc while settling in to their current orbits.

Study: Earth May Collide With Another Planet - Science News | Science & Technology | Technology News - FOXNews.com

Selected quotes:

"New computer simulations reveal a slight chance that a disruption of planetary orbits could lead to a collision of Earth with Mercury, Mars or Venus in the next few billion years.

The new model results provide the strongest evidence to date of the solar system's future in this regard.

'These are the first calculations that really answer the question of the long-term stability of the solar system in a truly definitive way,' Laughlin told SPACE.com.

That's because Laskar and Gastineau's model relies on non-averaged equations and accounts for general relativity.

Previous models were based on averaged equations for planetary motion and didn't include the effects of general relativity.

Evidence for such melees has been found in exoplanetary systems, including one in which the object 2M1207B may have formed from the collision and merger of two planets .

Our own moon was created when a Mars-sized object hit Earth about 4 billion years ago, theorists figure."


Interesting YouTube discussion showing that heating preceeded global warming by hundreds of years in ice core studies, thus could not be causitive.


YouTube - Al Gore Debates Global Warming
stargazer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Propeller this post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 21st June 2009, 12:36 AM   #46
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: western Maine, USA
Posts: 59
Default Re: Climate Change | Global Warming | BS or not?

Short article in the newest Sky and Telescope magazine internet edition. Here is a quote:



"Finally, let me note that all of these solar scientists are building on the work of John A. Eddy, who died June 10th at the age of 78.

John A. Eddy, a highly regarded solar physicist, died on June 10, 2009, at the age of 78.
Barbara EddyEddy gained fame in 1976 as the solar sleuth who confirmed that from 1645 to 1715 the Sun remained virtually spotless. During this "Maunder Minimum," as he dubbed it, solar activity essentially ceased, and it remains perplexing for modern-day theorists. Coincidentally, this period closely matches one of the coldest climatic periods on record, the middle of the "Little Ice Age" that plunged Europe into a series of unbearable winters. (I added the underline.)

More recently, Eddy has explored solar-terrestrial relationships, and before his death he finished a book (to be published by NASA) titled The Sun, the Earth and Near-Earth Space: A Guide to the Sun-Earth System."



The full article is at :


SkyandTelescope.com - News Blog - Solar Sleuths Tackle the "Quiet Sun"
stargazer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Propeller this post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 22nd June 2009, 01:32 PM   #47
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Bob Tooley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Scarborough, Maine USA
Posts: 128
Default Re: Climate Change | Global Warming | BS or not?

Stargazer,

I'm starting to become more concerned with 'Global Flooding" up here then with roasting or freezing to death... I drove Rt1 from Rockland to Bucksport in that Firday night rain and 'every' low area had a 'Road Flooded' sign put out. I thought about you and how your plants are probably treading water now just to stay afloat... The central coast got 4-inches of rain that night... and a lot of the secondary roads were under mined in many places... and you could kayak on Rt 1 right through downtown Lincolnville Beach.....
Bob Tooley is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Propeller this post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 23rd June 2009, 02:19 AM   #48
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: western Maine, USA
Posts: 59
Default Re: Climate Change | Global Warming | BS or not?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Tooley View Post
Stargazer,

I'm starting to become more concerned with 'Global Flooding" up here then with roasting or freezing to death... I drove Rt1 from Rockland to Bucksport in that Firday night rain and 'every' low area had a 'Road Flooded' sign put out. I thought about you and how your plants are probably treading water now just to stay afloat... The central coast got 4-inches of rain that night... and a lot of the secondary roads were under mined in many places... and you could kayak on Rt 1 right through downtown Lincolnville Beach.....
Today is no better, keeps pouring rain. Maybe I should make "snorkels" for the emerging plants to breath! I find it hard to believe that plants that emerged a full month ago look like they are a day or two old.

I'm starting to have a hard time enjoying the rain. Everything I need to do is outdoors, and it's hard or impossible to do most of them in the rain. I've already used up most of my "can do in the rain" type jobs. I suppose I could pile cut brush for burning by hand. Bit wet to use the tractor. Hard to enjoy piling brush in the rain though, when it would be so much nicer (and not as heavy) in the sunshine. And with the bucket on the tractor helping out.

One dock I reset in the lake is a just even with the surface, the lake is high even though they are spilling a lot of water. Neighbor's docks are underwater. I truly believe our country should develop water power at every tiny fall of water. Water has so much mass that it totally surpasses wind generation. And it runs all night, unlike solar. Plus, it is not used up and can be reused at every additional fall as it moves to the sea. Yet no one even talks about. At one time water powered all of New England. With almost prehistoric handmade wooden wheels. With today's technology I'm sure we could make small highly efficient water powered generators.

I could almost use one in the fall of rain, here on top of a hill!
stargazer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Propeller this post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 23rd June 2009, 10:50 AM   #49
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Bob Tooley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Scarborough, Maine USA
Posts: 128
Default Re: Climate Change | Global Warming | BS or not?

I can't see why more coastal areas don't use tidal pools for generating electricity... You could harness the tide coming and going with just an hour shutdown between the high and low periods, etc.,... You certainly couldn't get a more reliable 'mass-forced' power source.... Of course the tourists might object because it didn't ...'look nice'... Fun living in the best State money can buy..isn't it ?

When the beavers start dropping full sized poplar trees and having them yarded up close to their dams, you know things are getting bad...

We built a 12vdc powered camp with a gas engine that turned a 12v car alternator to charge up the batteries and an ac inverter to run some of the smaller 110vac items... I suppose you could run a small water wheel, or even a wind mill, to turn an alternator as well...
Bob Tooley is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Propeller this post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2009, 12:34 AM   #50
Admin - Dip Arb & Hort & Seldom Wrong
 
Ekka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 9,789
Default Re: Climate Change | Global Warming | BS or not?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ekka View Post
Interesting read for sure.

He wrote, a long time ago too mind you...

Quote:
Tyndall thus concluded that water vapour, the strongest radiant heat absorber, is the most important gas controlling Earth's temperature. Without water vapour, he wrote, the Earth's surface would be "held fast in the iron grip of frost."

Applying his radiation studies to minimum nighttime temperatures and dew/frost formation, Tyndall correctly postulated that dew and frost are caused by a loss of heat through radiative processes. He even suggested these factors gave London a "heat island" — meaning the city was warmer than its surrounding areas.

Tyndall speculated fluctuations in water vapour and carbon dioxide could be related to climate change and the onset of ice ages. At century's end, Swedish scientist Svante Arrhenius applied Tyndall's discovery to the ice-ages riddle, mathematically showing that halving the atmosphere carbon dioxide concentration could lower European temperatures to an ice-age chill.
You know, I dont think there were even people present in Australia 50,000 years ago but climate change not hunters killed large creatures. I dont think the industrial revolution started till maybe the last 200 years.

Who killed our Australian giant marsupials? : News : The University of Melbourne

Quote:
Media Release, Saturday 12 August 2006

We determined that there is no evidence of humans butchering the marsupials. People were not even at the scene of the crime, with the oldest evidence of humans at the site at least 10,000 years after the giant mammals went extinct,” said Ms Jacqui Duncan of the Archaeology Program at La Trobe University

“The animals probably died of starvation during drought around 55,000 years ago," she said.

“This is a significant find – unraveling more clues to what actually happened in prehistoric Australia."

While the scientists think that drought is the most likely cause of the giant marsupial deaths at Lake Menindee, the search to confirm the real culprits of the continent-wide extinction continues.
Now a few years beforehand there was this type of thinking which came out of a USA university.

CU-Boulder Researcher To Discuss Ancient Australian Climate Change At Chancellor's Lecture Series March 7 | News Center | University of Colorado at Boulder

Quote:
Feb. 22, 2001

In the past several years, Miller and his colleagues have found evidence the earliest humans who peopled Australia some 55,000 years ago inadvertently disrupted the continent's food chain by burning vast areas of native vegetation. This appears to have resulted in mass extinctions of megafauna on the continent, he said.

The researchers used eggshells of large, flightless birds known as Genyornis to date changes in climate and ecosystems. More than 85 percent of Australia's megafauna became extinct in addition to Genyornis, including 19 species of marsupials weighing over 220 pounds, a hippo-sized wombat, a 25-foot-long and three-foot-in-diameter snake, a 25-foot-long lizard and a Volkswagen-sized tortoise.

Miller and his colleagues speculate that Genyornis and the other extinct mammals -- which fed primarily on shrubs and trees -- disappeared after centuries of burning by humans in the continent's interior changed the ecosystem's flora to primarily desert grasses. One of his research associates, Beverly Johnson, is a former CU graduate student of Miller's now at the University of Washington.
LOL, yeah right, like there's never any natural fires.
Now, another scientific study of the same thing reckons Ice Age hunters ate them all. Bugger me, seems the experts are so dumb that they should drag brush!
Quote:
Giant prehistoric kangaroos wiped out by hungry Ice Age hunters - Times Online

Giant prehistoric kangaroos wiped out by hungry Ice Age hunters


It stood tall at 6’5, weighed over 500lbs, had the face of a koala and the body of a sturdy kangaroo. And apparently it was delicious.

Scientists think they have discovered the reason behind the demise of the prehistoric Australian marsupial Procoptodon goliah – better known as the giant, short-snouted kangaroo. They say it was not climate change, as has always been assumed, but hungry Ice Age hunters.

The animal – about three times bigger than a modern-day kangaroo and with slightly different features - was one of many Ice-Age megafauna whose demise has long been debated among experts, but usually put down to the changing environment.

However an international team of scientists, led by Gavin Prideaux from Flinders University in South Australia, has discovered a different theory behind the reason the animal became extinct 45,000 years ago.

The research, published this week in the US journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, not only shines a new light on the demise of the animal – the largest kangaroo ever to evolve - but also on the landscape of Australia at the time.

While the scientists were unable to uncover direct proof of the hunting theory – such as a fossil or the like displaying wounds – they did so by a process of elimination.

The team studied the anatomy of the giant kangaroo’s skull as well as scratches on its teeth and isotopes in the tooth enamel, and determined that it had a “strong preference” for drought-tolerant plants such as saltbushes, rather than grass which is the staple diet of the modern-day kangaroo.

It had also evolved in response to arid conditions, but became extinct during one of the wetter periods it had previously survived – 5,000 years after humans are thought to have first arrived in Australia.

The high intake of saltbushes would have meant the giant kangaroo drank more water and would have been frequently found at waterholes and therefore vulnerable to hunters.

These combined factors led the scientific team to determine that “human hunting was a more likely extinction cause”.

“If Procoptodon goliah ate a lot of saltbush, then just like modern saltbush-fed sheep, it probably needed to drink more regularly than its grazing contemporaries,” Dr Linda Ayliffe, a US-based member of the scientific team, said.

And, just like saltbush-fed sheep, it would have tasted good too, according to Dr Prideaux, an Australian palaeontologist who specialises in the giant kangaroo.

Describing the animal, which was thought to have been in abundance across the whole of Australia, Dr Prideaux said it had “the head of a koala – minus the fluffy ears – and the body of a giant, solid kangaroo”.

Unlike its modern-day relatives, the giant kangaroo was very big and imposing and not as agile.

“These were a lot slower and gravitated towards waterholes, so they were basically sitting ducks for the humans,” Dr Prideaux told The Times.

“And they fed on saltbush so if you think the modern kangaroo tastes nice, this would have been lovely.”

According to the scientists, Australia was also once the home to rhinoceros-sized herbivores, marsupial lions, giant wombats and giant lizards, and suffered the worst extinctions of all the continents, losing 90 per cent of the larger species by 40,000 years ago.

Despite the extinction of the Procoptodon goliah, kangaroos are now commonly found in Australia. Along with the emu, the iconic Australian marsupial is featured on the country’s national coat of arms.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Giantkangaroo585_577719a.JPG (72.9 KB, 41 views)
Ekka is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Propeller this post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2009, 01:20 AM   #51
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: western Maine, USA
Posts: 59
Default Re: Climate Change | Global Warming | BS or not?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ekka View Post
"However an international team of scientists, led by Gavin Prideaux from Flinders University in South Australia, has discovered a different theory behind the reason the animal became extinct 45,000 years ago.

The research, published this week in the US journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, not only shines a new light on the demise of the animal – the largest kangaroo ever to evolve - but also on the landscape of Australia at the time.

While the scientists were unable to uncover direct proof of the hunting theory – such as a fossil or the like displaying wounds – they did so by a process of elimination."

Really! Where did they "discover" this theory. In a dream?

Typical total lack of understanding of the scientific method. Today's "scientists" are pathetic. At best this idea could be described as a hypothesis, not a theory. A hypothesis must be tested against reality by a repeatable experiment that can be verified by others.

Note the total contradictions in the explanations of what happened. They completely change their minds every time you look. Yet we are supposed to trust that these people not only accurately understand how our earth, climate, and man interact, we are supposed to believe that they know how to "fix" the problem of global climate. The "problem" being that climate fluctuates. Yet everything we know proves that the climate has always fluctuated. If the climate could be stabilized, how do we know that wouldn't destroy life, instead of enhancing it?
stargazer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Propeller this post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2009, 01:40 AM   #52
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Bob Tooley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Scarborough, Maine USA
Posts: 128
Default Re: Climate Change | Global Warming | BS or not?

Every so often we have whales beach themselves in the Carolina State areas, and all attempts to re-float them and 'point them in another direction', fail. 'Naturalists' have blamed everything from coastline radio stations to the sonar on submarines for this rash of 'strange behavior', and they still can't figure why this continues to occur..... If the dumb asses looked at the geological topography of the region in the Silurian Period 425-million years ago, they'd see the exact site where this happens was the inlet to the huge inland ocean which covered most of this country at the time. Whales often travel on ancestral navigation and pre-existing routes. Moose will walk into a number of northern cities because, 'in-their-mind', these structures don't exist, but were rather built in their former ancestral routes.

It goes back to how many people,...including some of the smarter one's who can and will publish information,...have watched too many movies and have adopted the 'Hollywood" history into their own present day reality...

I'm going to adopt Tony Curtis' philosophy... "Where there's confusion, there's profit"............ and keep the "confused", thoroughly """Confused"""
Someone might just as well make money off the problem because it certainly isn't making any sense on it's own....
Bob Tooley is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Propeller this post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2009, 02:03 AM   #53
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Bob Tooley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Scarborough, Maine USA
Posts: 128
Default Re: Climate Change | Global Warming | BS or not?

Additional: The TV station in Bangor had a 'trivia' question on the weather portion of the broadcast... "What is the most destructive force in nature ?"

The choices were: "Tornadoes, hurricanes, lightning and tidal waves".

"""Their""" answer was: "Lightning"....
Of course being my usual self,.....I challenged the answer...

I asked Steve MacKay, their weatherman, to qualify lightning's status for that position and his reply was, " Lightning causes fires and deaths mounting into the billions of dollar...ya da, ya da, ya da."

Lightning is the 'only' way that atmospheric nitrogen gets forced into the soil for plant use (nitrogen-fixing plants being the exception)... so without lightning and it's byproduct, nitrogen relocation... there wouldn't be any "nature"..... It's sad when nature and the dollar are considered synonymous, and the rest of that green stuff out there is just getting in the way...

It's hard to see the light of day when so many heads are up so many asses.
Bob Tooley is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Propeller this post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 25th June 2009, 01:06 AM   #54
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: western Maine, USA
Posts: 59
Default Re: Climate Change | Global Warming | BS or not?

Excellent point about lightning. If man could "fix" the problem of lightning, the earth could become barren without the added nitrogen.

I'm glad you mentioned that certain plants can fix nitrogen - actually the bacteria living on their roots. I grow clover between the rows of my garden for that purpose. I often pull some clover up by the roots to check for the nodules on the roots where the bacteria live and do their thing.

Interestingly, some trees fix nitrogen. Alder (not much of a tree) and apparently black locust. I'm making this claim based on observation, perhaps there is some other explanation for the fertility surrounding these trees.

Even though Texas through Kansas are really hot, still no emphasis on global warming from the media. It has to be hot in New York, Massachusetts, and Washington DC before they push it on the news. So "global" warming seems to mean east coast warming, as far as media hype and law making here in the USA. Guarantee if they get a big heat wave in DC there will be a push for new laws.





I wish Obama would do something about this enormous and appalling CO2 pollution blasting right up through the atmosphere, photographed by the astronauts in the International Space Station on June 12th, 2009. Here is a chance to prove that mankind can make a real difference, by controlling wasteful production of CO2.



It's from Russia's Sarychev Peak, a volcano.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Volcano from ISS.jpg (20.4 KB, 95 views)
stargazer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Propeller this post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 27th June 2009, 04:23 AM   #55
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Bob Tooley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Scarborough, Maine USA
Posts: 128
Default Re: Climate Change | Global Warming | BS or not?

Can you imagine the millions of dollars being made on this 'photo op' ? It's like so many other 'panic-equals-funding' programs set up by the government, and it's associated agencies... Notice when it's "fund raising" time, all the issues which 'just have to be addressed and worked on'...come alive..(again)..
You can't get the forest service out of the offices and into the field, even if you use dynamite, but when there's something to sensationalize in the media... look who shows up to grand stand... It's just justifying their existence, because there's no way you can ask for extra money, or prevent job cuts, unless you can prove you're doing something. Generally it doesn't have to be much...given enough time they'll explode it into a statewide epidemic, even if it's only been found on one tree in one isolated area..

The Global Warming issues aren't any different..."panic equals funding", and 'every agency' from the CDC to the FAA have used the same tactic anytime it was necessary to prevent funding cuts... It's becoming too obvious, so watch out for a curve-ball when they wear this one out...
Bob Tooley is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Propeller this post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2009, 05:32 PM   #56
Admin - Dip Arb & Hort & Seldom Wrong
 
Ekka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 9,789
Default Re: Climate Change | Global Warming | BS or not?

Polish Academy of Sciences slam Gore's CO2 theory also.

Polish Academy of Sciences Questions Gore's Man-Made Global Warming Theory | Washington Examiner

Quote:
Having a part in this significant debate, the Geologic Science Committee of the Polish Academy of Sciences wishes to turn to 10 fundamental aspects of the problem closely related to the functioning of geosystem - the complex interdependence of processes occurring in the lithosphere, hydrosphere, atmosphere, and biosphere. The knowledge of these factors should be the foundation for any rational and careful decisions, which could interfere in the geosystem.

1. The climate of the Earth depends on the interaction between the surface and the atmosphere, both of which are heated by solar radiation characterized by a cyclical, variable intensity. The climate is influenced by the Earth's yearly revolution around the Sun, thermics, changes in ocean waters flow, air mass movement, mountain massif position, their uplift and erosion in time perspective as well as changes in the continents' position as a result of their permanent wandering.

2. Geologic research proves irrefutably that the permanent change is the fundamental characteristic of the Earth's climate as throughout its entire history, and the changes occur in cycles of varied length - from several thousand to just a few years. Longer climate cycles are provoked by the extraterrestrial factors of astronomic character as well as by the changes of the Earth's orbital parameters, in brief - by regional and local factors. Not all reasons for climate change or their phenomena are fully known yet.

3. Although in the history of the Earth, a considerably warmer climate than today had dominated, there had been repeated occurrences when the Earth experienced massive global cooling which always resulted in vast ice sheets that sometimes even reached the subtropics. Therefore, reliable forecasts of changes in the Earth's climate (not to mentioned efforts to prevent, shape, or act against them) must take into account the results of its research of the Earth's geological history - a time when humanity (and the industry) were not on our planet.

4. Since twelve thousand years ago, the Earth is in the another phase of cyclical warming and is near the maximum of its intensively. Just in the last 2.5 million years, periods of warming have on several occasions intertwined with ice ages, which have already been well identified.

5. The current warming is accompanied by an increase of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere: water vapour is dominant among them, and in smaller quantities there are carbon dioxide, methane, nitrogen oxides and ozone. This has always happened because it is an occurrence that accompanies cyclical warming and cooling. The periodic increase in the number of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, sometimes a value even several times larger than at present, has accompanied previous warming even before man inhabited the Earth.

6. Over the past 400 thousand years - even without human intervention - the level of CO2 in the air, based on the Antarctic ice cores, has already been similar 4 times, and even higher than the current value. At the end of the last ice age, within a time of a few hundred years, the average annual temperature changed over the globe several times, in total, it has gone up by almost 10 °C in the northern hemisphere, therefore the changes mentioned above were incomparably more dramatic than the changes reported today.

7. After a warm period in the past millennium, by the end of the thirteenth century, a cold period had begun and it lasted up to the mid-nineteenth century, and then a warm period in which we are living had begun. The phenomenon observed today, in particular the temporary rise of global temperature, are the result of the natural rhythm of climate change. Warmer and warmer oceans have a smaller ability to absorb carbon dioxide, and reducing the area of the long term permafrost leads to more rapid decomposition of organic compounds in the soil, and thus to increased emissions of greenhouse gases. For billions of years, Earth's volcanic activity along the lines of lithosphere plate boundaries, hidden mainly beneath the surface of the oceans, has been constantly providing the atmosphere with CO2 with various levels of intensively.

In the geo-system gas is removed from the atmosphere to the biosphere and from the lithosphere through the process of photosynthesis that is bound in the living organisms - including the shell carbonate marine organisms and after their death it is stored in the huge limestone on the bottom of the seas and the oceans, while on land it is bound in various organic sediments.

8. A detailed monitoring of climate parameters has been carried out for slightly over 200 years; it only regards parts of continents, which constitute only 28% of the world. Some of the older measuring stations established - as a result of progressive urbanization, in the peripheries of the cities, are now within them. This factor, among other things, is the reason for the rise of the measured values of temperature. The research of the vast areas of the oceans has only been launched 40 years ago. Measurements taken for this kind of short periods of time can not be considered as a firm basis for creating fully reliable models of thermal changes on the surface of the Earth, and their accuracy is difficult to verify. That is why far-reaching restraint needs to be kept regarding blaming, or even giving the biggest credit to man for the increased level of emissions of greenhouse gases, for such a theory has not been proven.

9. There is no doubt that a certain part of the rise of the level of greenhouse gases, specifically CO2, is associated with human activity therefore, steps should be taken to reduce the amount on the basis of the principles of sustainable development, a cease of extensive deforestation, particularly in tropical regions. It is equally important to take up and pursuit appropriate adapting actions that will mitigate the effects of the current warming trend.

10. Experiments in natural science show that one-sided observations, those that take no account of the multiplicity of factors determining certain processes in the geo-system, lead to unwarranted simplifications and wrong conclusions when trying to explain natural phenomena. Thus, politicians who rely on incomplete data may take wrong decisions. It makes room for politically correct lobbying, especially on the side of business marketing of exceptionally expensive, so called eco-friendly, energy technologies or those offering CO2 storage (sequestration) in exploited deposits. It has little to do with what is objective in nature. Taking radical and expensive economic measures aiming at implementing the emission only of few greenhouse gases, with no multi-sided research into climate change, may turn out counterproductive.

The PAN Committee of Geological Sciences believes it necessary to start an interdisciplinary research based on comprehensive monitoring and modelling of the impact of other factors -not just the level of CO2 - on the climate. Only this kind of approach will bring us closer to identifying the causes of climate change
Ekka is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Propeller this post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 1st July 2009, 01:17 AM   #57
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: western Maine, USA
Posts: 59
Default Re: Climate Change | Global Warming | BS or not?

Good post, Ekka.

It's a pleasure to read an intelligent discussion for a change. My big problem with the global warming thing is the way people like to imagine they "know" they are completely right, and anyone who is sceptical is a fool. They want to rush forward with half baked plans that could do more harm than good. I'm more fearful of having idiots panicking and rushing to "emergency" "solutions" than I am about global warming.

I am however totally in favor of alternative energy. Just below my home is a dam with 7 miles of water backed up behind it. I hate to think of the energy that could be harvested at the water fall with no effect on the system, the water would still run down to the sea. With the continuous rain we have had for the last month - still ongoing - I've seen them release more water than ever over that dam, they really opened it up at one point.

Water, solar, wind, tides, let's use it all. I'm not in favor of geothermal, however, because I do fear global cooling, and bringing up heat and releasing it into our atmosphere should not even be attractive to the global warming crowd.

I'd like to see thousands of small local energy sources, all types, developed and tied into the grid. This would reduce distribution losses and provide a system that could not be easily knocked out. Every region should use whatever they have available locally.

I don't think using up all the oil for transportation is intelligent. When we finally do run out we will still have to face the problem, so lets start now, but without panic. Then we will always have oil for lubrication and other purposes.
stargazer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Propeller this post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 3rd July 2009, 03:35 AM   #58
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Bob Tooley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Scarborough, Maine USA
Posts: 128
Default Re: Climate Change | Global Warming | BS or not?

Stargazer,

I'm going to check off the site and if you want to contact me direct, my email address is: this-tree@maine.rr.com it's been nice chatting with you and hope we can have additional dialogs ................ Bob Tooley Scarborough
Bob Tooley is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Propeller this post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10th July 2009, 09:15 PM   #59
Admin - Dip Arb & Hort & Seldom Wrong
 
Ekka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 9,789
Default Re: Climate Change | Global Warming | BS or not?

I knew the answer would lie in technology, not tree huggers.

Synthetic tree captures carbon 1000 times faster than real trees
Ekka is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Propeller this post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12th July 2009, 11:24 AM   #60
Admin - Dip Arb & Hort & Seldom Wrong
 
Ekka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 9,789
Default Re: Climate Change | Global Warming | BS or not?

Here's a darn good read, do tab along the pages as there's 6 of them.

Meet the man who has exposed the great climate change con trick | The Spectator

Quote:
James Delingpole talks to Professor Ian Plimer, the Australian geologist, whose new book shows that ‘anthropogenic global warming’ is a dangerous, ruinously expensive fiction, a ‘first-world luxury’ with no basis in scientific fact. Shame on the publishers who rejected the book


Quote:
If there’s any justice, Heaven And Earth will do for the cause of climate change realism what Al Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth did for climate change alarmism. But as Plimer well knows, there is now a powerful and very extensive body of vested interests up against him: governments like President Obama’s, which intend to use ‘global warming’ as an excuse for greater taxation, regulation and protectionism; energy companies and investors who stand to make a fortune from scams like carbon trading; charitable bodies like Greenpeace which depend for their funding on public anxiety; environmental correspondents who need constantly to talk up the threat to justify their jobs.

Does he really believe his message will ever get through? Plimer smiles. ‘If you’d asked any scientist or doctor 30 years ago where stomach ulcers come from, they would all have given the same answer: obviously it comes from the acid brought on by too much stress. All of them apart from two scientists who were pilloried for their crazy, whacko theory that it was caused by a bacteria. In 2005 they won the Nobel prize. The “consensus” was wrong.’
Ekka is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Propeller this post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Timing belt change clementine Non Tree Related chat 20 12th January 2009 11:41 AM
Colder climate diesel tree variant Grits Ask an Arborist here 6 20th November 2008 02:58 PM
Altering climate affecting your pruning? blair duncanson General Tree Chat 22 18th April 2008 04:08 AM
Global Warming OsAGe85 Non Tree Related chat 11 12th August 2007 11:44 AM


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 04:48 PM.


TreeWorld @ 2010