![]() |
| ||||||||||||||||||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Admin - Razor sharp and independent 2 X Diploma Level 5 qualified arborist Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Brisbane
Posts: 12,820
|
PDF dated 27th September 2005 for ACT Australia protection zones. First I have heard/seen of it, could be adapted into your reports, there is no actual Australian Standard for this issue and I have been using the British Standard BS 5837. If anyone has that British Standard do they mind putting it in this thread. This formula is drip line + 2m or where there's absence of drip line a distance of 4m from the trunk (radius) which ever is the greater. The diagram shows it. The downfall would be tall thin trees, Italian cypress, pencil pines etc. Also new thread here AS4970 Draft| Australian Development Tree Protection
__________________ |
| |
| | #2 |
| Admin - Razor sharp and independent 2 X Diploma Level 5 qualified arborist Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Brisbane
Posts: 12,820
|
This document is from Campbelltown Council SA and uses the 10x method.
__________________ |
| |
| | #3 |
| Monument Status Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Townsville Nth Queensland & Gold Coast Sth Queensland
Posts: 1,985
|
This is the one I use and incorporate into reports, works for all species and permits you to have input based on your knowledge and experience of particular species tolerances. ![]() Its also the table used by a number of better LGA's here in Qld. |
| |
| | #4 |
| Admin - Razor sharp and independent 2 X Diploma Level 5 qualified arborist Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Brisbane
Posts: 12,820
|
Hey Sean I have a Corymbia maculata (spotted gum) 830mm DBH and 30m tall (guessed) on a development site. I'd call it Moderate Mature according to your chart, what would you call it?
__________________ |
| |
| | #5 |
| Monument Status Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Townsville Nth Queensland & Gold Coast Sth Queensland
Posts: 1,985
|
Generally with Eucs I'd place them in the poor tolerance to root damage/disturbance but its certainly fine to put a particular species that your experience tells you is moderately tolerant into that category. Providing the tree has not (to your knowledge) been damaged in the past the difference may not be critical, also remember that roots don't grow in symetrical circles evenly spaced so site specific soil/ground conditions play an important role here too TPZ or CRZ fencing can and should reflect any such anomalies...it can be to the great advantage of the long term health of the tree.
|
| |
| | #6 |
| Admin - Razor sharp and independent 2 X Diploma Level 5 qualified arborist Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Brisbane
Posts: 12,820
|
I just spoke with ecologist at BCC and rule of thumb is 10x DBH. I mentioned my concerns and she will notify other DA ecologists and forward treeworld on to them as resource also. ![]()
__________________ |
| |
| | #7 |
| Monument Status Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Townsville Nth Queensland & Gold Coast Sth Queensland
Posts: 1,985
|
I hope she does and they do drop in...and if they feel that 10X DBH is an acceptable one size fits all, that will provide sufficient protection for older sensitive significant trees to the community down there that they present their reasoning....looking forward to the justification. As you abley pointed out even 1 or 2m difference in radius makes a big difference in volume of roots and soil protected. 1m diameter at breast hieght = 10m radius (I'm presuming its radius not diameter!) thats 314 square metres 1m dbh of a tree intolerant of root damage in mature age class = 15m radius....thats 707 square metres.....big difference eh? Last edited by Sean Freeman; 9th October 2007 at 08:09 PM. Reason: removed reference to Eucs to adhere to the table posted previously |
| |
| | #8 |
| Admin - Razor sharp and independent 2 X Diploma Level 5 qualified arborist Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Brisbane
Posts: 12,820
|
Big difference yes. Keep getting the message out, hey Sean, maybe link those pics in here of the Hospital trees that died!
__________________ |
| |
| | #9 |
| Over mature heritage tree Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Sydney
Posts: 823
|
I think TPZ requirements vary greatly with regard to species, soil type and suitability of the tree to the particular site and available microclimate. Each case should be assessed on it's individual situation. Steve |
| |
| | #10 |
| Sappling Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: USA
Posts: 25
|
I was on the Tree Commission for my city for about 15 years an done of the things that we accomplished was the creation of a series of regulations regarding trees. Section 5.14 of our city regulations covers most tree issues. Here is a link http://www.ci.milford.ct.us/Public_D...%202-21-06.pdf I will post the link to our regulations to protect trees from consturction damage when I find it again. The city has changed their web site and I am having trouble locating it.
__________________ Drive a MINI, the most fun you can have with your trousers on. |
| |
| | #11 |
| Admin - Razor sharp and independent 2 X Diploma Level 5 qualified arborist Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Brisbane
Posts: 12,820
|
Dr Kim D Coder's 1996 PDF, also covers structural root plate from Mattheck's work.
__________________ |
| |
| | #12 |
| Former Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: SE USA
Posts: 753
|
and this
|
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Root bags for nursery trees | mdvaden | General Tree Chat | 6 | 20th July 2010 10:32 PM |
| Tree Protection on Development Sites, are there any Australian Standards? | Eric Frei | General Tree Chat | 18 | 31st January 2008 02:02 PM |
| Deep Tree Root Feeding | JuneBug747 | Ask an Arborist here | 8 | 22nd October 2007 01:19 PM |
| "Deep Root" feeding in your area? | mdvaden | General Tree Chat | 3 | 16th August 2007 07:38 AM |