|
| ||||||||||||||||||
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| |||||||
 |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
2nd December 2010, 12:47 PM
| #1 |
| Sappling  Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Brisbane
Posts: 24
|  Waterhousia - Decurrent / Concurrent
Hi, I was at a nursery today inspecting some Waterhousia floribunda for a landscape project. When inspecting against the NATSPEC (Specifying trees) criteria I was a little unsure if this species is decurrent or concurrent. My guess is concurrent? Does anyone know? |
|  |
|
2nd December 2010, 05:47 PM
| #2 |
| Admin - Owner Palm & Tree Services in Brisbane  Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Brisbane
Posts: 12,993
| Re: Waterhousia - Decurrent / Concurrent
Well, they are not apically dominant like say Norfolk pines. They usually have many first order branches and a spreading canopy. But perhaps at nursery size that might be harder to tell.
__________________ |
|
| |
|
5th December 2010, 05:31 PM
| #3 |
| Former Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Gold Coast QLD
Posts: 121
| Re: Waterhousia - Decurrent / Concurrent
Do you mean decurrent/excurrent? If so, I would say that Waterhousia floribunda has a decurrent form. I have never heard of a "concurrent" form. |
|
| |
|
6th December 2010, 08:30 AM
| #4 |
| Sappling Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Brisbane
Posts: 24
| Re: Waterhousia - Decurrent / Concurrent
Yes, Sorry, decurrent not concurrent. |
|
| |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Linear Mode
