![]() |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Tree World Sponsor Links and Advertising Rates | |||||
![]() | ![]() | | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Sappling Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Mildura
Posts: 27
| Went out to quote on a lower branch removal of a Red Gum ( Euc camaldulensis) today . The branch was a fairly large one for a fairly young tree approx 20-30 years old. The tree was in excellent health as it has been constantly watered due to it being close to wine grapes (the reason for removal of limb) I reasoned that this removal would be ok in other words the tree would handle it based on my experience, until the owner told me there had been a trench cut close to the tree (where exactly she didn't know ) about 5 years ago and it had cut large roots . I know that lower limbs (all limbs for that matter) provide excellent suppression/ shock absorbson in adverse weather ? My question is will the removal of this limb cause the tree to become unaceptably unstable (ie top heavy) ? any comments would be gladly recieved cheers Fatkoala |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Over mature heritage tree Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: SE USA
Posts: 585
| If it can be reduced and still farm enough sunshine to live that is preferable.
__________________ Guy Meilleur | Forensic Arborist | Better Tree Care |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Sappling Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Mildura
Posts: 27
| Will try to get some photos today, I am erring on the side of pruning as the only real target if the tree fails is vines, they are mechanically harvested so the time a human spends under the tree is minimal cheers |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| I'm new here so be nice Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Sydney
Posts: 2
| Well there is your answer if there is little or no potential to hit a target there is little or no hazard posed by the potential failure of the tree, cut off the limb and let the tree stay standing. |
| | |