![]() |
| ||||||||||||||||||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Sappling Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 36
|
If in a basic SRT setup, a 100 load on a rope trunk tied over a single branch exerts 200 lbs on the branch, what happens when the rope now goes over two branches horizontal to each other?
|
| | |
| | #2 |
| Mature tree Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 263
|
The load should be shared by the two branches. Load division would depend on the angle of the rope over each branch and the amount of friction at the live end over that branch.
Last edited by Gunslinger; 25th May 2009 at 05:39 AM. Reason: Completed sentence |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Sappling Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 36
|
Assuming all matching angles, would you get your 100 lbs back, compared to tying directly to one branch? Also, what kind of bird is that in your avatar? Thanks! |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Admin - Owner Palm & Tree Services in Brisbane Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Brisbane
Posts: 12,986
| Quote:
If we were to swap out those branches with real efficient pulleys what would the equation look like? I'm more a visual person, I need to see things. It would look like this .... and I wont give the answer yet however I can say you wont get rid of #100 that easy.
__________________ | |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Sappling Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 36
|
Your drawing is exactly my question. Sounds like you are saying a moving climber would exert more load on the branch than if he were just hanging there. But not factoring in that, just looking at the static load, would three branches get the 100# back?
|
| | |
| | #6 |
| Mature tree Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 263
| |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Semi-mature vigorous tree Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Gainesville, fl
Posts: 104
|
It seems like the loads on each branch would still be 200 lbs however the angle of pull would be more on a 45 degree instead of straight down.
|
| | |
| | #8 |
| Admin - Owner Palm & Tree Services in Brisbane Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Brisbane
Posts: 12,986
|
Your answer lies in this thread, do read post 30 Make the calcs and you'll soon be the master rigger. Doubling effect at pulley block It is all about THE ANGLE OF THE DANGLE!
__________________ |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Mature tree Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 263
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Sappling Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 28
|
Ekka has gone about this the right way by putting in perfect pulleys. This means the tension on the rope is everywhere the same. Analyzing the situation for pulley A, there is a rope leg pulling straight down with 100 lb. and a rope leg pulling horizontally to the right with 100 lb. You can't just add these up and get 200 lb.--you have to account for the 90-degree angle between the two ropes. This is done by vector addition, and the result is about 141 lbs. The pulley feels this 141-lb. load pulling downward to the right at a 45-degree angle. These problems are easy to do with a diagram. Start at the pulley and draw an arrow pointing to the right that is 10 cm long. That represents the 100 lbs. pulling to the right. At the tip of the arrowhead, draw an identical arrow pointing straight down. This represents the downward 100 lbs. Now draw an arrow from the pulley to the second arrowhead. That arrow (vector) represents the force the pulley feels. Its direction represents the direction of the force the pulley feels, and its length, 14.1 cm, represents the magnitude of the force. Since 10 cm equals 100 lb., the pulley feels about 141 lbs. |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Admin - Owner Palm & Tree Services in Brisbane Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Brisbane
Posts: 12,986
| LOL, I was wondering when you'd show up, you cannot help yourself but to hang around these pulleys and vectors ![]() I wonder what a Norwegians answer would be. Hahaha Also I think you missed this one, go check it out and double check my math. Results of tree-pulling (SIM) a possible fraud?
__________________ |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| Sappling Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 28
| Quote:
| |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Thanks and a question | Purdyite | Chainsaws | 3 | 23rd January 2012 12:19 AM |
| Wind load analysis for trees / Palm stability | guiripalmero | Tree Information and Facts | 4 | 9th December 2008 06:45 AM |
| question | Lee Winger | Tree machinery and equipment | 11 | 1st September 2007 09:12 AM |