Tree World  


Go Back   Tree World > All About Trees > Climbing - Gear, Ropes, Knots & Rigging

silky saws ,waste of time?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23rd October 2010, 01:02 PM   #1
Sappling
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: VA
Posts: 5
Default silky saws ,waste of time?

i keep hearing people say tese things are crap,taks twise as lomg as a chain saw,

how well do they work...i wannnatry one out for pruning

one that is around 25$


whats yalls experience with them,cut fast ,light,easy to use in tight spots
freeweight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd October 2010, 04:10 PM   #2
Moderator - Previously known as JayD
 
Jeff Darby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: TreeWorld, Sydney Australia
Posts: 2,056
Default Re: silky saws ,waste of time?

Quote:
Originally Posted by freeweight View Post
i keep hearing people say tese things are crap,taks twise as lomg as a chain saw,

how well do they work...i wannnatry one out for pruning

one that is around 25$


whats yalls experience with them,cut fast ,light,easy to use in tight spots
look Tafe trained climbers will always strap on their silky, for tight stuff where you can not get the saw back in and that extra whisk on a back cut where you just cant manage your 200t

here's a link to a similar thread..Hand and Pole saws some might say you look a little gay with a hand saw in a tree fight...lol
__________________

Member: Australian Tree Association

Join the Australian Tree Association...Have your voice heard !

Arboriculture, A life long study for some, a passing phase for others

© Jeffrey J Darby 2011
Jeff Darby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th October 2010, 09:49 AM   #3
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Levi Parkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kansas
Posts: 213
Default Re: silky saws ,waste of time?

I love silky handsaws and never enter a tree without one. Most of the time I can have a climb cut off with my silky in the time it takes to start a chainsaw... whithin reason of course. I have a zubat and would rather cut limbs up to the size of my forearm with that than a chainsaw. Anything bigger, break out the 200t. Good luck finding one under $50 though....
Levi Parkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th October 2010, 01:05 PM   #4
Veteran Heritage Status
 
Apocalypsse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Victoria, Australia
Posts: 1,152
Default Re: silky saws ,waste of time?

Depends on what you are trying to compare a chainsaw with a handsaw with. Smaller branches you are better off using the handsaw, will give you a much better finish. In the time it takes to unhook & start your saw the handsaw will have the job complete.
Apocalypsse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th October 2010, 12:14 PM   #5
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
second-gen_monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: miami, fl
Posts: 121
Default Re: silky saws ,waste of time?

i use the gomtaro 300 when i can. reciently been using a sthill but only because i got a good deal at $15 a peice from a shop that closed out down here.

the silkys are champs and seem to cut alot smoother. they also loose less teeth when i get mad and use them to machette annoying tips but at 60-80 a peice i think i'll just use up these sthills first.
second-gen_monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th October 2010, 10:29 PM   #6
Sappling
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 29
Default Re: silky saws ,waste of time?

I always have my silky on my harness, great for pruning small limbs and agree with others. just as quick as starting and working with the 200.
Also with the silky you have the free hand to cut and throw which is alot more dangerous with the MS200....
Hayden Watt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st November 2010, 01:01 PM   #7
Mature Tree
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Posts: 1,594
Default Re: silky saws ,waste of time?

They're pretty sharp.

TrevMcRev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th January 2011, 07:13 AM   #8
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Daniel Janjic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NSW
Posts: 111
Default Re: silky saws ,waste of time?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrevMcRev View Post
They're pretty sharp.

YouTube - Sliding belt 0001
Thats cool.

I love to use my Zubat to prune light stuff, even talk while cutting, like the client saying "yeah now that little one out there, and that one above you, oh and the next one up!"...
__________________
Cheer's

Dano

http://www.treelove.com.au
Daniel Janjic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th January 2011, 03:15 PM   #9
Admin - Owner Palm & Tree Services in Brisbane
 
Eric Frei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 12,986
Default Re: silky saws ,waste of time?

Quote:
Originally Posted by freeweight View Post
i keep hearing people say tese things are crap,taks twise as lomg as a chain saw
Is it just me?

All push bikes are crap because they take longer than a car to get there.

That Stanley hacksaw is crap because it takes twice as long as an oxy-cutter.
Eric Frei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th January 2011, 03:47 PM   #10
Sappling
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 28
Default Re: silky saws ,waste of time?

I broke the top handle on my 338 a fortnight or so ago so I sent her in to be sorted and in the mean time I borrowed an ARS straight blade hand saw it was only 20 or so cm long and used it for the next couple of days doing line clearance. The saw performed way better than I expected it to cutting stuff up too about wrist size with ease and quick too, cuts were so clean aswell, I'll definitely be ordering one in my next lot of gear
sir_nick2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th January 2011, 04:02 AM   #11
Mature tree
 
jim1nz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: International, Germany
Posts: 473
Default Re: silky saws ,waste of time?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric Frei View Post
Is it just me?

All push bikes are crap because they take longer than a car to get there.

That Stanley hacksaw is crap because it takes twice as long as an oxy-cutter.
Yep all depends...

It takes longer to get in you car and drive to the corner shop than it does to jump on ya bike.

Its easier and quicker to cut the end off a bolt with a hack saw than set up the oxy and cut it off.

Freeweight, its $25 just get one and try it
jim1nz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th January 2011, 10:12 AM   #12
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Daniel Janjic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NSW
Posts: 111
Default Re: silky saws ,waste of time?

Just a note of advice, when choosing a saw try to make sure it has some form of front finger guard / quillon, or finger grooves, as most are designed to only cut on the pull stroke, it is often unavoidable to encounter some sort of resistance on the push stroke, if your hand slips you could easily shred fingers, if not careful..

Choose carefully
__________________
Cheer's

Dano

http://www.treelove.com.au
Daniel Janjic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th January 2011, 07:13 PM   #13
Over mature heritage tree
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Australia.
Posts: 780
Default Re: silky saws ,waste of time?

I bought a folding handsaw last year after people were talking about them here, about $50. I keep it in the truck, it's amazing how much I use it and I've got plenty of chainsaws.

For $25 I don't think you should be too worried about buying one.
Done it is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2011, 09:35 AM   #14
I'm new here so be nice
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Guildford, Surrey, UK
Posts: 2
Default Re: silky saws ,waste of time?

The Silky is the way to go. i love mine and use it for most pruning and dead wooding. The only problem is that you will often catch yourself with it and it looks like you've been bitten by a tiny shark.
Smallsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2011, 01:46 PM   #15
Over mature heritage tree
 
Willard Holmen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 651
Default Re: silky saws ,waste of time?

I have about 6 different Silkys which I use on the job and they work very well for me. Being very proud of them and bragging about them on another site, I was cut down to size when an arborist from Japan called them "disposable junk".
According to him in Japan where the Silky tooth pattern technology came from, there are still saw makers and filers who practice the trade of building and maintaining these type of saws and have being doing it for hundreds of years.
But he says there are getting to be fewer of these tradesmens around because of the cheaper disposable Silkys that can be bought in the box stores.

Willard.
Willard Holmen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd March 2011, 05:42 AM   #16
Mature tree
 
Victor Lindsay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: ?
Posts: 441
Default Re: silky saws ,waste of time?

When working a tree, not a removal, a silky is all i take up with me. If I need a chainsaw, i'll just rope one up, then back down it goes until i need it again. Moving through a tree with a chainsaw is like swimming with a 20 pound brick.
Victor Lindsay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th March 2011, 02:27 AM   #17
Sappling
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Brunswick
Posts: 15
Default Re: silky saws ,waste of time?

I use a fanno handsaw, I never go up without one, even on removals. For the added few ounces of weight, you can't deny it's effectiveness, efficiency and versatility.

Pony Saw

Anything up to the size of my wrist I don't even bother with the chainsaw, no point, my fanno will dust it way faster. Just take care of them. A lot of folk just use and abuse handsaws because they see them as "disposable". They are inexpensive, not cheap. They are a tool, and I was always taught use the right tool for the job and take care of your tools and they'll take care of you. The fact remains, you will always get a better, cleaner cut while pruning with a hand saw then with a chainsaw, and if you give your handsaw a little love, clean it, sharpen it and don't heave it out of the tree, it'll serve you well and faithfully for a long time.

Last edited by Eric Frei; 29th March 2011 at 07:45 AM. Reason: changed link
Rockin'Robin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2011, 12:10 AM   #18
I'm new here so be nice
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3
Default Re: silky saws ,waste of time?

Definitely not a waste of time! nor a waste of money. ($85.00 canadian) They are the saws of handsaws. Lightweight, sharp, quick and give a beautiful clean cut. One of my favorite pruning tools.
Larissa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st March 2011, 02:07 PM   #19
Mature tree
 
Joshua Rugg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: maui, hawaii
Posts: 285
Default Re: silky saws ,waste of time?

are you aussies getting the ARS saws yet? i have heard on the "tree buzz forum" that the ARS saws are far Superior to silky.
Joshua Rugg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st March 2011, 06:10 PM   #20
Mature tree
 
Jamie Myers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: england
Posts: 252
Default Re: silky saws ,waste of time?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hard-as-Stihl View Post
are you aussies getting the ARS saws yet? i have heard on the "tree buzz forum" that the ARS saws are far Superior to silky.
The old ARS used to have wooden handles and thin blades. Is this still the case Silky saws are awesome for pruning.
Jamie Myers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st April 2011, 06:33 AM   #21
Veteran Heritage Status
 
Apocalypsse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Victoria, Australia
Posts: 1,152
Default Re: silky saws ,waste of time?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hard-as-Stihl View Post
are you aussies getting the ARS saws yet? i have heard on the "tree buzz forum" that the ARS saws are far Superior to silky.
Thats scary. When I use my Silky I have to have a gentle touch otherwise it tries to dig like I've taken the rakers right off a chainsaw.
Apocalypsse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st April 2011, 09:58 AM   #22
Moderator - Previously known as JayD
 
Jeff Darby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: TreeWorld, Sydney Australia
Posts: 2,056
Default Re: silky saws ,waste of time?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hard-as-Stihl View Post
are you aussies getting the ARS saws yet? i have heard on the "tree buzz forum" that the ARS saws are far Superior to silky.
I use ARS at work, they are a good saw..imo, the choice between these two hand saws will come down personal preferance..just like stihl's and Huskies...I feel Silky saw are a tad better than ARS, the same as I feel Stihl just knock off huskies. The ARS is well made with a plastic handle and you can replace the blade when it's no longer servicable
__________________

Member: Australian Tree Association

Join the Australian Tree Association...Have your voice heard !

Arboriculture, A life long study for some, a passing phase for others

© Jeffrey J Darby 2011
Jeff Darby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th November 2011, 04:53 AM   #23
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: AUS
Posts: 134
Default Re: silky saws ,waste of time?

I have managed to snap the tips off both of mine.
The pocket boy is not that great w/o the tip.(Too short)
IMO the handle is the best thing on them, if only they could improve blade strength.
The Bahco/Sandvik saw has a much superior blade on it.
Paul Toivonen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th November 2011, 07:35 PM   #24
I'm new here so be nice
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: colorado
Posts: 1
Default Lawn and Garden

Trees are an important component of the natural landscape because of their prevention of erosion and the provision of a weather-sheltered ecosystem in and under their foliage.

Last edited by Jeff Darby; 30th November 2011 at 05:44 AM. Reason: removed link
flute is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th November 2011, 10:53 PM   #25
Sappling
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 28
Default Re: Lawn and Garden

Quote:
Originally Posted by flute View Post
Trees are an important component of the natural landscape because of their prevention of erosion and the provision of a weather-sheltered ecosystem in and under their foliage.



Last edited by Jeff Darby; 30th November 2011 at 05:45 AM. Reason: removed link
Chris75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th November 2011, 11:11 PM   #26
Veteran Heritage Status
 
Apocalypsse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Victoria, Australia
Posts: 1,152
Default Re: Lawn and Garden

Quote:
Originally Posted by flute View Post
<snip>
This smells like spam.
Apocalypsse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2011, 06:16 AM   #27
Mature tree
 
Joshua Rugg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: maui, hawaii
Posts: 285
Default Re: silky saws ,waste of time?

i just started using barnell handsaws. pretty nice if you ask me
__________________
Stihl
MS192T 14"
MS200T 16"
MS261 16"
MS440 25"

Husqvarna 359 20"
394XP 32"

Poulan P3314 14" ( new hire/groundy saw)
Joshua Rugg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2011, 05:16 AM   #28
I'm new here so be nice
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 4
Default Re: silky saws ,waste of time?

I have always owned the zubat 330 but never really used it that much until i had an american backpacker come and work for me who used his religiously,now i will not go up a tree with out one,perfect for line clearing or possum clearence etc... plus when customer or groundies pointing out which one branches to cut you don't have to be turning the chainsaw on and off all the time.Also i'm not sure about anyone else but if i know all branches required to cut i find it a bit of a better feeling to get up there with my Zubat and just swing around and carry out job.
Brocky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2011, 11:56 PM   #29
Semi-mature vigorous tree
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Perth, WA
Posts: 238
Default Re: silky saws ,waste of time?

silky = avoid noise abaitment act?
Rob Chace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th January 2012, 02:01 PM   #30
Sappling
 
Scott Augur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: in a yurt in the Cascade Mountains of USA
Posts: 18
Default Re: silky saws ,waste of time?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrevMcRev View Post
They're pretty sharp.

YouTube - Sliding belt 0001
Thanks for posting TrevMcRev...this is the kind of real life testing/experience that cuts through so much Bull Sh*t in our game. I have run my Silky Suguoi across my knuckles in the tree and besides bleeding and cutting a nice pair of gloves, it took a long time to heal. Silky Saw is great...just slow down and make sure it is cutting what it is supposed to be cutting, HUH!?!
Scott Augur is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Large tree removal,excavator hire,Waste wood removal Drouin Tree Service Tree Industry Forum Sponsors - Links 13 23rd September 2010 09:56 PM
Re: Silky Oak problems Markk Ask an Arborist here 2 6th September 2010 10:19 PM
SLF on a silky oak Garry Brockley General Tree Chat 7 10th January 2010 08:51 AM
UK tree surgeon busted £565 for carrying tree waste Eric Frei Non Tree Related chat 17 26th March 2009 06:43 AM
Felling Silky Oak playfordtree The Video Forum 15 15th November 2007 09:36 PM


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 04:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Advertising on Treeworld
TreeWorld @ 2012