What got me though, is that one of the higher PR landscape designer sites, has had only like 6 backlinks from minimal to so-so websites, and maintained a 5, while most of the rest of us with many backlinks, and some sites done by good SEOs, held a mere PR of 3 and 4.
That's the kind of thing that made me be very unsure about whether Google is really giving the credit for a link from a higher site, or is really giving credit from a "relevant" site.
The secrecy and cloak of the green meter really leaves a lot of guessing.
Ever been lurking in the SEO forums where the webmasters are panicking as their site rise and plunge?
What's odd - many of them have dozens or hundreds of good backlinks so they claim - and I see no reason to doubt them.
At next Google dance, all their good rank backlink sites haven't changed, yet they say they've fallen off the face of the planet in the SERPs. |