24th April 2007, 03:18 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
| Admin - Dip Arb & Hort
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Brisbane
Posts: 7,516
| 
http://www.workcover.nsw.gov.au/Publ...g_machines.htm Quote:
The ruling states that reliance on training, instruction or supervision is not an acceptable alternative control to physical guarding of dangerous moving parts.
Remember!! Training of an operator in the safe method of using a machine does not make an unsafe machine safe for use.
| http://www.worksafe.vic.gov.au/wps/w...chine_guarding Quote: |
Consider installing an electronic activating mechanism that is activated by sensors worn by the operator.
| http://www.courts.sa.gov.au/judgment...0-SASC-108.htm Quote: |
Following a hearing in the District Court, on 23 December 2005 the trial Judge found that Rivett, Arbor and WMC had breached duties of care to both Conor and Christopher. Conor?s damages were assessed at $1,084,451.53 and judgment was entered in that amount. Judgment was entered for Christopher in the amount of $20,000. No reduction was made for contributory negligence. The Judge apportioned responsibility - 70% against Rivett and Arbor and 30% against WMC.
| |
|  |